Category talk:Systemd

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Scope

This category does too many things:

For example, systemd-boot, systemd-nspawn, systemd-networkd and udev do not belong to the two categories.

On a related note, I feel this is exactly the type of change that should be discussed beforehand.

-- Lahwaacz (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

I think this is rather a scope issue of systemd and not my categorization. The way I see it is that:
I apologize for not discussing this beforehand. --Larivact (talk) 06:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Since systemd tools do not share a common goal/scope, I think that fitting one single category for all systemd tools into a sensible category structure based on common topics is not possible. Is it necessary to use categories to document that the "systemd-*" tools (and udev) belong to systemd? Categories are intended for finding pages which have something in common and I don't think people would look for e.g. the systemd-boot page because it belongs to systemd - they would probably go to the upstream documentation which lists all tools. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 17:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)