File systems: Difference between revisions

From ArchWiki
m (archiso.git moved to gitlab.archlinux.org, see https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-releng/2020-May/003963.html)
(→‎Types of file systems: linux-ck-reiser4 package remove from AUR in November 2019; see https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-requests/2019-November/034957.html)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 176: Line 176:
| [[Reiser4]]
| [[Reiser4]]
| {{man|8|mkfs.reiser4|url=}}
| {{man|8|mkfs.reiser4|url=}}
| {{AUR|linux-ck-reiser4}}{{Broken package link|package not found}}
|
| {{AUR|reiser4progs}}
| {{AUR|reiser4progs}}
|
|
Line 205: Line 205:
=== Stackable file systems ===
=== Stackable file systems ===


* {{App|aufs|Advanced Multi-layered Unification Filesystem, a FUSE based union filesystem, a complete rewrite of Unionfs, was rejected from Linux mainline and instead OverlayFS was merged into the Linux Kernel.|http://aufs.sourceforge.net|{{AUR|aufs}}{{Broken package link|package not found}}}}
* {{App|aufs|Advanced Multi-layered Unification Filesystem, a FUSE based union filesystem, a complete rewrite of Unionfs, was rejected from Linux mainline and instead OverlayFS was merged into the Linux Kernel.|http://aufs.sourceforge.net|{{AUR|linux-aufs}}}}


* {{App|[[eCryptfs]]|The Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem is a package of disk encryption software for Linux. It is implemented as a POSIX-compliant filesystem-level encryption layer, aiming to offer functionality similar to that of GnuPG at the operating system level.|http://ecryptfs.org|{{Pkg|ecryptfs-utils}}}}
* {{App|[[eCryptfs]]|The Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem is a package of disk encryption software for Linux. It is implemented as a POSIX-compliant filesystem-level encryption layer, aiming to offer functionality similar to that of GnuPG at the operating system level.|http://ecryptfs.org|{{Pkg|ecryptfs-utils}}}}

Revision as of 15:06, 5 July 2020

From Wikipedia:

In computing, a file system or filesystem controls how data is stored and retrieved. Without a file system, information placed in a storage medium would be one large body of data with no way to tell where one piece of information stops and the next begins. By separating the data into pieces and giving each piece a name, the information is easily isolated and identified. Taking its name from the way paper-based information systems are named, each group of data is called a "file". The structure and logic rules used to manage the groups of information and their names is called a "file system".

Individual drive partitions can be setup using one of the many different available filesystems. Each has its own advantages, disadvantages, and unique idiosyncrasies. A brief overview of supported filesystems follows; the links are to Wikipedia pages that provide much more information.

Types of file systems

The factual accuracy of this article or section is disputed.

Reason: /proc/filesystems only lists file systems whose modules are either built-in or currently loaded. Since Arch kernels have most of the file systems built as loadable modules, /proc/filesystems will show very few, if any, usable file systems. (Discuss in Talk:File systems)

See filesystems(5) for a general overview and Wikipedia:Comparison of file systems for a detailed feature comparison. File systems supported by the kernel are listed in /proc/filesystems.

In-tree and FUSE file systems
File system Creation command Userspace utilities Archiso [1] Kernel documentation [2][3] Notes
Btrfs mkfs.btrfs(8) btrfs-progs Yes btrfs.html Stability status
VFAT mkfs.fat(8) dosfstools Yes vfat.html
exFAT mkfs.exfat(8) exfatprogsAUR No
mkexfatfs(8) exfat-utils Yes N/A (FUSE-based)
F2FS mkfs.f2fs(8) f2fs-tools Yes f2fs.html Flash-based devices
ext3 mke2fs(8) e2fsprogs Yes ext3.html
ext4 mke2fs(8) e2fsprogs Yes ext4.html
HFS mkfs.hfsplus(8) hfsprogsAUR No hfs.html Classic Mac OS file system
HFS+ mkfs.hfsplus(8) hfsprogsAUR No hfsplus.html macOS (8–10.12) file system
JFS mkfs.jfs(8) jfsutils Yes jfs.txt
NILFS2 mkfs.nilfs2(8) nilfs-utils Yes nilfs2.html
NTFS mkfs.ntfs(8) ntfs-3g Yes N/A (FUSE-based) Windows file system
ReiserFS mkfs.reiserfs(8) reiserfsprogs Yes
UDF mkfs.udf(8) udftools Optional udf.html
XFS mkfs.xfs(8) xfsprogs Yes

xfs.txt
xfs-delayed-logging-design.txt
xfs-self-describing-metadata.txt

Note: The kernel has its own NTFS driver (see ntfs.html), but it has limited support for writing files.
Out-of-tree file systems
File system Creation command Kernel patchset Userspace utilities Notes
APFS mkapfs(8) linux-apfs-dkms-gitAUR apfsprogs-gitAUR macOS (10.13 and newer) file system. Read only, experimental.
Bcachefs bcachefs(8) linux-bcachefs-gitAUR bcachefs-tools-gitAUR
Reiser4 mkfs.reiser4(8) reiser4progsAUR
ZFS zfs-linuxAUR, zfs-dkmsAUR zfs-utilsAUR OpenZFS port

Journaling

All the above filesystems with the exception of ext2, FAT16/32, Reiser4 (optional), Btrfs and ZFS, use journaling. Journaling provides fault-resilience by logging changes before they are committed to the filesystem. In the event of a system crash or power failure, such file systems are faster to bring back online and less likely to become corrupted. The logging takes place in a dedicated area of the filesystem.

Not all journaling techniques are the same. Ext3 and ext4 offer data-mode journaling, which logs both data and meta-data, as well as possibility to journal only meta-data changes. Data-mode journaling comes with a speed penalty and is not enabled by default. In the same vein, Reiser4 offers so-called "transaction models" which not only change the features it provides, but in its journaling mode. It uses a different journaling techniques: a special model called wandering logs which eliminates the need to write to the disk twice, write-anywhere—a pure copy-on-write approach (mostly equivalent to btrfs' default but with a fundamentally different "tree" design) and a combined approach called hybrid which heuristically alternates between the two former.

Note: Reiser4 does provide an almost equivalent to ext4's default journaling behavior (meta-data only) with the use of the node41 plugin which also features meta-data and inline checksums, optionally combined with the wandering logs behaviour it provides depending on what transaction model is chosen at mount time.

The other filesystems provide ordered-mode journaling, which only logs meta-data. While all journaling will return a filesystem to a valid state after a crash, data-mode journaling offers the greatest protection against corruption and data loss. There is a compromise in system performance, however, because data-mode journaling does two write operations: first to the journal and then to the disk (which Reiser4 avoids with its "wandering logs" feature). The trade-off between system speed and data safety should be considered when choosing the filesystem type. Reiser4 is the only filesystem that by design operates on full atomicity and also provides checksums for both meta-data and inline data (operations entirely occur, or they entirely do not and does not corrupt or destroy data due to operations half-occurring) and by design is therefor much less prone to data loss than other file systems like Btrfs.

Filesystems based on copy-on-write (also known as write-anywhere), such as Reiser4, Btrfs and ZFS, have no need to use traditional journal to protect metadata, because they are never updated in-place. Although Btrfs still has a journal-like log tree, it is only used to speed-up fdatasync/fsync.

FUSE-based file systems

See FUSE.

Stackable file systems

  • aufs — Advanced Multi-layered Unification Filesystem, a FUSE based union filesystem, a complete rewrite of Unionfs, was rejected from Linux mainline and instead OverlayFS was merged into the Linux Kernel.
http://aufs.sourceforge.net || linux-aufsAUR
  • eCryptfs — The Enterprise Cryptographic Filesystem is a package of disk encryption software for Linux. It is implemented as a POSIX-compliant filesystem-level encryption layer, aiming to offer functionality similar to that of GnuPG at the operating system level.
http://ecryptfs.org || ecryptfs-utils
  • mergerfs — a FUSE based union filesystem.
https://github.com/trapexit/mergerfs || mergerfsAUR
  • mhddfs — Multi-HDD FUSE filesystem, a FUSE based union filesystem.
http://mhddfs.uvw.ru || mhddfsAUR
  • overlayfs — OverlayFS is a filesystem service for Linux which implements a union mount for other file systems.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/overlayfs.html || linux
  • Unionfs — Unionfs is a filesystem service for Linux, FreeBSD and NetBSD which implements a union mount for other file systems.
http://unionfs.filesystems.org/ || not packaged? search in AUR
  • unionfs-fuse — A user space Unionfs implementation.
https://github.com/rpodgorny/unionfs-fuse || unionfs-fuse

Read-only file systems

  • EROFS — Enhanced Read-Only File System is a lightweight read-only file system, it aims to improve performance and compress storage capacity.
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/filesystems/erofs.html || erofs-utilsAUR
  • SquashFS — SquashFS is a compressed read only filesystem. SquashFS compresses files, inodes and directories, and supports block sizes up to 1 MB for greater compression.
http://squashfs.sourceforge.net/ || squashfs-tools

Clustered file systems

  • Ceph — Unified, distributed storage system designed for excellent performance, reliability and scalability.
https://ceph.com/ || ceph
  • Glusterfs — Cluster file system capable of scaling to several peta-bytes.
https://www.gluster.org/ || glusterfs
  • IPFS — A peer-to-peer hypermedia protocol to make the web faster, safer, and more open. IPFS aims replace HTTP and build a better web for all of us. Uses blocks to store parts of a file, each network node stores only content it is interested, provides deduplication, distribution, scalable system limited only by users. (currently in alpha)
https://ipfs.io/ || go-ipfs
  • MooseFS — MooseFS is a fault tolerant, highly available and high performance scale-out network distributed file system.
https://moosefs.com || moosefs
  • OpenAFS — Open source implementation of the AFS distributed file system
http://www.openafs.org || openafsAUR
  • OrangeFS — OrangeFS is a scale-out network file system designed for transparently accessing multi-server-based disk storage, in parallel. Has optimized MPI-IO support for parallel and distributed applications. Simplifies the use of parallel storage not only for Linux clients, but also for Windows, Hadoop, and WebDAV. POSIX-compatible. Part of Linux kernel since version 4.6.
http://www.orangefs.org/ || not packaged? search in AUR
  • Sheepdog — Distributed object storage system for volume and container services and manages the disks and nodes intelligently.
https://sheepdog.github.io/sheepdog/ || sheepdogAUR
  • Tahoe-LAFS — Tahoe Least-Authority Filesystem is a free and open, secure, decentralized, fault-tolerant, peer-to-peer distributed data store and distributed file system.
https://tahoe-lafs.org/ || tahoe-lafsAUR

Identify existing file systems

To identify existing file systems, you can use lsblk:

$ lsblk -f
NAME   FSTYPE LABEL     UUID                                 MOUNTPOINT
sdb                                                          
└─sdb1 vfat   Transcend 4A3C-A9E9

An existing file system, if present, will be shown in the FSTYPE column. If mounted, it will appear in the MOUNTPOINT column.

Create a file system

File systems are usually created on a partition, inside logical containers such as LVM, RAID and dm-crypt, or on a regular file (see Wikipedia:Loop device). This section describes the partition case.

Note: File systems can be written directly to a disk, known as a superfloppy or partitionless disk. Certain limitations are involved with this method, particularly if booting from such a drive. See Btrfs#Partitionless Btrfs disk for an example.
Warning:
  • After creating a new filesystem, data previously stored on this partition can unlikely be recovered. Create a backup of any data you want to keep.
  • The purpose of a given partition may restrict the choice of file system. For example, an EFI system partition must contain a FAT32 file system, and the file system containing the /boot directory must be supported by the boot loader.

Before continuing, identify the device where the file system will be created and whether or not it is mounted. For example:

$ lsblk -f
NAME   FSTYPE   LABEL       UUID                                 MOUNTPOINT
sda
├─sda1                      C4DA-2C4D                            
├─sda2 ext4                 5b1564b2-2e2c-452c-bcfa-d1f572ae99f2 /mnt
└─sda3                      56adc99b-a61e-46af-aab7-a6d07e504652 

Mounted file systems must be unmounted before proceeding. In the above example an existing filesystem is on /dev/sda2 and is mounted at /mnt. It would be unmounted with:

# umount /dev/sda2

To find just mounted file systems, see #List mounted file systems.

To create a new file system, use mkfs(8). See #Types of file systems for the exact type, as well as userspace utilities you may wish to install for a particular file system.

For example, to create a new file system of type ext4 (common for Linux data partitions) on /dev/sda1, run:

# mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda1
Tip:
  • Use the -L flag of mkfs.ext4 to specify a file system label. e2label can be used to change the label on an existing file system.
  • File systems may be resized after creation, with certain limitations. For example, an XFS filesystem's size can be increased, but it cannot reduced. See Wikipedia:Comparison of file systems#Resize capabilities and the respective file system documentation for details.

The new file system can now be mounted to a directory of choice.

Mount a file system

To manually mount filesystem located on a device (e.g., a partition) to a directory, use mount(8). This example mounts /dev/sda1 to /mnt.

# mount /dev/sda1 /mnt

This attaches the filesystem on /dev/sda1 at the directory /mnt, making the contents of the filesystem visible. Any data that existed at /mnt before this action is made invisible until the device is unmounted.

fstab contains information on how devices should be automatically mounted if present. See the fstab article for more information on how to modify this behavior.

If a device is specified in /etc/fstab and only the device or mount point is given on the command line, that information will be used in mounting. For example, if /etc/fstab contains a line indicating that /dev/sda1 should be mounted to /mnt, then the following will automatically mount the device to that location:

# mount /dev/sda1

Or

# mount /mnt

mount contains several options, many of which depend on the file system specified. The options can be changed, either by:

See these related articles and the article of the filesystem of interest for more information.

Tip: File systems can also be mounted with systemd-mount instead of mount. If the mount point is not specified, the file system will be mounted at /run/media/system/device_identifier/. This allows to easily mount a file system without having to decide where to mount it. See systemd-mount(1) for usage and more details.

List mounted file systems

To list all mounted file systems, use findmnt(8):

$ findmnt

findmnt takes a variety of arguments which can filter the output and show additional information. For example, it can take a device or mount point as an argument to show only information on what is specified:

$ findmnt /dev/sda1

findmnt gathers information from /etc/fstab, /etc/mtab, and /proc/self/mounts.

Unmount a file system

To unmount a file system use umount(8). Either the device containing the file system (e.g., /dev/sda1) or the mount point (e.g., /mnt) can be specified:

# umount /dev/sda1

or

# umount /mnt

See also