Update file system
Can chroot be used to update the entire root file system? After the chroot, running the mount command reports
/dev/root on / type ext3 with /dev/root being a symbolic link to /dev/mmcblk0p2. Unmounting /dev/root and /dev/mmcblk0p2 both report invalid argument. Rereading the partition table using
blockdev --rereadpt /dev/mmcblk0 reports device or resource busy. My guess it mmcblk0 is busy because /dev/mmcblk0p2 is still the root file system under the changed root file system I am using now. Before doing a chroot, I kills all the applications but the shell used to run chroot. Any suggestions on how I can successfully reread the partition table in this use model? --Tfischer
About using arch-chroot in other linux distributions
My interest with the added tip wasn't about packaging for other distributions (I didn't even mention the word 'package'). It was only to provide a quick explanation about how to use arch-chroot from another distribution for the sole purpose of chrooting into Arch itself. This was motivated by a personal issue, where I had to use arch-chroot from another linux distribution to access my arch partition, due to a filesystem/boot error. Also, notice that this tip wasn't really related to Install from Existing Linux -- no mentions about 'installations' either.
- arch-chroot is just a bash script (i.e. it is not compiled as the tip said), so why not just extract the script from the Arch package and use it on the other system? I think that it is a standalone script (i.e. not sourcing other parts) so it should just work... -- Lahwaacz (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, the reason for compiling / running 'make' is that, in the tarball I indicated in the tip, the only thing that is present regarding arch-chroot is an 'arch-chroot.in' file. 'make' is necessary for m4 to replace what needs to be replaced in this file, thus creating our final 'arch-chroot' bash script. Maybe using the term 'compile' wasn't a good idea, but the user should 'make' anyway (or, at least, manually get rid of the lines calling 'm4'). I won't insist on this, though, it is yours the final decision; I just wanted to say the reason for including the tip, I thought it could be useful for someone. Thiagowfx (talk) 19:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)