Talk:Dynamic DNS

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Separation of DDNS providers and applications to update them?

I just realised that the subsection for ddclient is buried inside the section for DDNS. However, it looks like each of these sections are dedicated to a single DDNS provider (i.e. a server) rather than the programs to update them.

Would it make sense to make two separate sections, "DDNS Providers" and "Programs to Update DDNS Hosts"? I know there are several more programs out there that are like ddclient which support many different providers.

--TheFlyingPengwyn (talk) 23:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Yes, it would certainly make much more sense than the current layout, but it should be clearly described which tools support which servers. Perhaps only the general tools should be moved into separate section, at least for the start? -- Lahwaacz (talk) 23:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
I had a go at restructuring it a bit. I left most of the subsections as they were but I did touch up their formatting a bit. I'm not familiar with the style guidelines though so it might be a bit off.--TheFlyingPengwyn (talk) 12:07, 2 November 2015 (UTC)