Talk:S-nail
Article cleanup
Current thoughts:
Although the current headers are creative, they need to be descriptive of what each section contains. See Help:Effective use of headers.All inline code should use Template:ic, especially in the S-nail#I'm in! section. See Help:Style#Code formatting.- There are several configuration files and scripts within the article that could possibly be linked from elsewhere. The biggest use case, mail forwarding from a server, isn't easy for newcommers to see.
It's difficult and unnecessary to include a changelog of the software in the introduction. I think this should be removed.Personal comments should be removed (e.g., "well, a complaint of the ArchWiki maintainer about the content of this page, ugh;").
Rdeckard (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- I'm working on an updated version here: User:Carpetsmoker/S-nail. Carpetsmoker (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I think this should be worked now. Thank you.
- I'm not deep in the subject, but Carpetsmoker's greenfield draft looks promising to me already. It makes me wonder what's the best approach going forward, either merge its more flexible/standard base structure here or cherry-pick from this article and merge it over to the new draft.
- Rdeckard, Carpetsmoker, others interested, thoughts? --Indigo (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)