Talk:S-nail

Article cleanup

Current thoughts:

• Although the current headers are creative, they need to be descriptive of what each section contains. See Help:Effective use of headers.
• All inline code should use Template:ic, especially in the S-nail#I'm in! section. See Help:Style#Code formatting.
• There are several configuration files and scripts within the article that could possibly be linked from elsewhere. The biggest use case, mail forwarding from a server, isn't easy for newcommers to see.
• It's difficult and unnecessary to include a changelog of the software in the introduction. I think this should be removed.
• Personal comments should be removed (e.g., "well, a complaint of the ArchWiki maintainer about the content of this page, ugh;").

Rdeckard (talk) 12:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Updated Rdeckard (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm working on an updated version here: User:Carpetsmoker/S-nail. Carpetsmoker (talk) 16:26, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

I think this should be worked now. Thank you.

I'm not deep in the subject, but Carpetsmoker's greenfield draft looks promising to me already. It makes me wonder what's the best approach going forward, either merge its more flexible/standard base structure here or cherry-pick from this article and merge it over to the new draft.

Rdeckard, Carpetsmoker, others interested, thoughts? --Indigo (talk) 17:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)