Difference between revisions of "ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Quick Reports vs. Reports: re)
(Quick Reports vs. Reports: good idea)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
:Well, since the quick reports come before normal reports in the workflow, the table might better be put at the top of the page; this would also preserve the functionality of the + button at the top for adding a discussion. An alternative would be to move [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team]], move [[ArchWiki:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] and leave only the table in [[ArchWiki:Reports]].
 
:Well, since the quick reports come before normal reports in the workflow, the table might better be put at the top of the page; this would also preserve the functionality of the + button at the top for adding a discussion. An alternative would be to move [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team]], move [[ArchWiki:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] and leave only the table in [[ArchWiki:Reports]].
 
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 13:22, 14 February 2012 (EST)
 
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 13:22, 14 February 2012 (EST)
 +
::I quite like that alternative... -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 13:50, 14 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 18:50, 14 February 2012

Quick Reports vs. Reports

Is is really necessary to distinguish between "Quick Reports" and "Reports?" Why not simply direct maintenance team members to the already-existing ArchWiki:Reports page. (We can add a table at the bottom for use with Wiki Monkey.) -- pointone 12:01, 14 February 2012 (EST)

Well, since the quick reports come before normal reports in the workflow, the table might better be put at the top of the page; this would also preserve the functionality of the + button at the top for adding a discussion. An alternative would be to move ArchWiki talk:Reports to ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team, move ArchWiki:Reports to ArchWiki talk:Reports and leave only the table in ArchWiki:Reports.
-- Kynikos 13:22, 14 February 2012 (EST)
I quite like that alternative... -- pointone 13:50, 14 February 2012 (EST)