Difference between revisions of "ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Deleting old redirect pages: new section)
(Remove closed.)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==<s>Quick Reports vs. Reports</s>==
Is is really necessary to distinguish between "Quick Reports" and "Reports?" Why not simply direct maintenance team members to the already-existing [[ArchWiki:Reports]] page. (We can add a table at the bottom for use with Wiki Monkey.) -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 12:01, 14 February 2012 (EST)
:Well, since the quick reports come before normal reports in the workflow, the table might better be put at the top of the page; this would also preserve the functionality of the + button at the top for adding a discussion. An alternative would be to move [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Maintenance Team]], move [[ArchWiki:Reports]] to [[ArchWiki talk:Reports]] and leave only the table in [[ArchWiki:Reports]].
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 13:22, 14 February 2012 (EST)
::I quite like that alternative... -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 13:50, 14 February 2012 (EST)
:::Uh I forgot to mention that now the page is updated with the alternative :) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 17:49, 20 February 2012 (EST)
== Deleting old redirect pages ==
I've gone through a number of old redirects, and I've updated the pages that linked to them to point to the proper page, which means the old redirect pages can be deleted. Is there a special place or method to report these pages? I did see that some of them were deleted via recent changes patrolling, but I think a better way to report them is needed. Should a semi-permanent section on [[ArchWiki:Reports]] be created to list them so that an administrator can go through the whole list?
-- [[User:Jstjohn|Jstjohn]] ([[User talk:Jstjohn|talk]]) 23:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:29, 7 August 2012