Difference between revisions of "ArchWiki talk:News"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Date format: closed)
(Request.)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
::{{ic|yyyy/mm/dd}} is fine; go nuts! -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 12:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
 
::{{ic|yyyy/mm/dd}} is fine; go nuts! -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 12:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Done, mm/dd/yyyy is too ambiguous for me... -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 15:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
 
:::Done, mm/dd/yyyy is too ambiguous for me... -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 15:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
== I18n ==
 +
Could some one add i18n link here ?
 +
-- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] 10:28, 20 April 2012 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Move to [[:Category:ArchWiki]] ==
 +
Now [[:Category:ArchWiki]] is a sub category of [[:Category:About Arch]]. Wiki news fit perfectly into [[:Category:ArchWiki]].
 +
-- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] 10:28, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

Revision as of 14:28, 20 April 2012

Date format

Is anybody contrary to changing the news date format to yyyy/mm/dd? -- Kynikos 08:56, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

Not at all, but e.g. 12 Feb 2012 is OK too. -- Karol 10:18, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
yyyy/mm/dd is fine; go nuts! -- pointone 12:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)
Done, mm/dd/yyyy is too ambiguous for me... -- Kynikos 15:54, 2 November 2011 (EDT)

I18n

Could some one add i18n link here ? -- Fengchao 10:28, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

Move to Category:ArchWiki

Now Category:ArchWiki is a sub category of Category:About Arch. Wiki news fit perfectly into Category:ArchWiki. -- Fengchao 10:28, 20 April 2012 (EDT)