Difference between revisions of "ArchWiki talk:Requests"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Deprecate "request" categories?: -)
(rm old discussions)
(12 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==<s>Change the scope of Specific requests?</s>==
Excluding General requests (Merge, Move...) I think the other requests can be divided in 2 groups: request a new article and request the specific modification of an existing article.
I would split Specific requests in "New article requests" and "Modification requests" (native English speakers can find more appropriate naming): the former will directly host the request, while the latter should be a list of links pointing to the talk page of the discussed article, which in turn will host the request (which is the common place for modification requests already). -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:43, 8 June 2011 (EDT)
This would restore [[Questionable edits]] to its original purpose, since at the moments it also hosts links to modification requests (though not systematically). -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:48, 8 June 2011 (EDT)
:I '''really''' like the idea. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 09:59, 18 June 2011 (EDT)
:: :) Should I wait some other response before implementing this and see how it works in practice? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 04:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
:::I like this idea, too. So much so, in fact, that I went ahead and implemented it. I also decided to better utilize the ArchWiki (project) namespace. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 15:31, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
::::I like the new look. And I like [[ArchWiki:Reports|Reports]] better than the former name too :-) Thanks a lot, pointone. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 16:18, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
:::::Wonderful job pointone! I'm sorry, I should have helped, being the proponent, but this month is being really busy for me... Anyway you have improved the page much beyond the original intention, brilliant!
:::::The initial idea to maintain a list of links to specific discussion pages would probably be too difficult to maintain and not so useful: see also [[ArchWiki_talk:Reports#Links_to_requests.3F]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:05, 25 June 2011 (EDT)
==Deprecate "request" categories?==
I'd like to replace "request" categories with the respective templates' "what links here" pages, since they equally fulfil the task without hiding uncategorized articles (which I suppose are still quite a lot):
*[[:Category:Request:Correction]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Accuracy]] and [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Out of date]]
*[[:Category:Request:Deletion]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Deletion]]
*[[:Category:Request:Expansion]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Expansion]] and [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Poor writing]]
*[[:Category:Request:Merge]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Merge]]
*[[:Category:Request:Move]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Moveto]]
*[[:Category:Request:Translation]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Bad translation]] and [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Translateme]]
*[[:Category:Stub]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Stub]]
*[[:Category:Linkrot]] -> [[Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Linkrot]]
This can be easily done by removing the category from the article status templates. Opinions?
-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 17:47, 20 February 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 16:37, 27 July 2012