|
|
| (18 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Change the scope of Specific requests?== | + | == Spring clean up == |
| − | Excluding General requests (Merge, Move...) I think the other requests can be divided in 2 groups: request a new article and request the specific modification of an existing article.
| + | There are many pages marked to be delete. Should we start a spring clean up of these pages. Many of the are marked by me. If there are objection, we can discuss one by one. -- [[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 04:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC) |
| − | | + | :I'll see what I can do this weekend, thanks for the reminder ^^ -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 07:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC) |
| − | I would split Specific requests in "New article requests" and "Modification requests" (native English speakers can find more appropriate naming): the former will directly host the request, while the latter should be a list of links pointing to the talk page of the discussed article, which in turn will host the request (which is the common place for modification requests already). -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:43, 8 June 2011 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | This would restore [[Questionable edits]] to its original purpose, since at the moments it also hosts links to modification requests (though not systematically). -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:48, 8 June 2011 (EDT)
| |
| − | :I '''really''' like the idea. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 09:59, 18 June 2011 (EDT) | |
| − | :: :) Should I wait some other response before implementing this and see how it works in practice? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 04:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT) | |
| − | :::I like this idea, too. So much so, in fact, that I went ahead and implemented it. I also decided to better utilize the ArchWiki (project) namespace. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 15:31, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
| |
| − | ::::I like the new look. And I like [[ArchWiki:Reports|Reports]] better than the former name too :-) Thanks a lot, pointone. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 16:18, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
| |
| − | :::::Wonderful job pointone! I'm sorry, I should have helped, being the proponent, but this month is being really busy for me... Anyway you have improved the page much beyond the original intention, brilliant!
| |
| − | :::::The initial idea to maintain a list of links to specific discussion pages would probably be too difficult to maintain and not so useful: see also [[ArchWiki_talk:Reports#Links_to_requests.3F]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:05, 25 June 2011 (EDT)
| |