ArchWiki talk:Requests

From ArchWiki
Revision as of 19:42, 21 February 2012 by Thestinger (talk | contribs) (Deprecate "request" categories?: re)
Jump to: navigation, search

Change the scope of Specific requests?

Excluding General requests (Merge, Move...) I think the other requests can be divided in 2 groups: request a new article and request the specific modification of an existing article.

I would split Specific requests in "New article requests" and "Modification requests" (native English speakers can find more appropriate naming): the former will directly host the request, while the latter should be a list of links pointing to the talk page of the discussed article, which in turn will host the request (which is the common place for modification requests already). -- Kynikos 06:43, 8 June 2011 (EDT)

This would restore Questionable edits to its original purpose, since at the moments it also hosts links to modification requests (though not systematically). -- Kynikos 06:48, 8 June 2011 (EDT)

I really like the idea. -- Karol 09:59, 18 June 2011 (EDT)
 :) Should I wait some other response before implementing this and see how it works in practice? -- Kynikos 04:50, 21 June 2011 (EDT)
I like this idea, too. So much so, in fact, that I went ahead and implemented it. I also decided to better utilize the ArchWiki (project) namespace. -- pointone 15:31, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
I like the new look. And I like Reports better than the former name too :-) Thanks a lot, pointone. -- Karol 16:18, 24 June 2011 (EDT)
Wonderful job pointone! I'm sorry, I should have helped, being the proponent, but this month is being really busy for me... Anyway you have improved the page much beyond the original intention, brilliant!
The initial idea to maintain a list of links to specific discussion pages would probably be too difficult to maintain and not so useful: see also ArchWiki_talk:Reports#Links_to_requests.3F. -- Kynikos 06:05, 25 June 2011 (EDT)

Deprecate "request" categories?

I'd like to replace "request" categories with the respective templates' "what links here" pages, since they equally fulfil the task without hiding uncategorized articles (which I suppose are still quite a lot):

This can be easily done by removing the category from the article status templates. Opinions?

-- Kynikos 17:47, 20 February 2012 (EST)

I agree with this plan. I think there are still a lot of uncategorized articles and these request categories make them much harder to find. thestinger 14:42, 21 February 2012 (EST)