Difference between revisions of "DeveloperWiki:Branding Proposals"
From ArchWiki
m (New page: = Introduction = This article is for discussing Arch Linux artwork and branding ideas. Feel free to add any suggestions or concerns. == Separate branding from upstream packages == Create ...) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
= Introduction = | = Introduction = | ||
| − | This article is | + | This article is part of the [[DeveloperWiki]]. Feel free to add any suggestions or concerns. |
| + | |||
== Separate branding from upstream packages == | == Separate branding from upstream packages == | ||
| Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
Include post-install notes informing the user where to find the theme and where to modify its preference. | Include post-install notes informing the user where to find the theme and where to modify its preference. | ||
| − | === Pros: === | + | ==== Pros: ==== |
* Upstream packages are delivered as-is | * Upstream packages are delivered as-is | ||
* Users can choose whether to download Arch-branded content | * Users can choose whether to download Arch-branded content | ||
| − | === Cons: === | + | ==== Cons: ==== |
* Users will have to modify theme settings manually | * Users will have to modify theme settings manually | ||
| + | |||
== Package Naming Scheme == | == Package Naming Scheme == | ||
| Line 33: | Line 35: | ||
Provide at least 1 style-neutral (minimalist) theme for the standard packages: | Provide at least 1 style-neutral (minimalist) theme for the standard packages: | ||
| − | === Completed: === | + | ==== Completed: ==== |
* Framebuffer logo | * Framebuffer logo | ||
* SLiM | * SLiM | ||
| Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
* Splashy | * Splashy | ||
| − | === Pending: === | + | ==== Pending: ==== |
* GDM | * GDM | ||
* KDM | * KDM | ||
* XDM | * XDM | ||
Revision as of 19:11, 5 May 2008
Contents
Introduction
This article is part of the DeveloperWiki. Feel free to add any suggestions or concerns.
Separate branding from upstream packages
Create a separate package of artwork for upstream packages, including:
- login themes
- desktop environment additions (wallpapers, icons, etc.)
- splash screens
Include post-install notes informing the user where to find the theme and where to modify its preference.
Pros:
- Upstream packages are delivered as-is
- Users can choose whether to download Arch-branded content
Cons:
- Users will have to modify theme settings manually
Package Naming Scheme
If artwork is separated from upstream packages, we should have a consistent naming scheme, for example:
- archlinux-themes-gdm
- archlinux-themes-kdm
- archlinux-themes-slim
- archlinux-themes-xfce
- archlinux-artwork-icons
- archlinux-artwork-logos
- archlinux-artwork-wallpapers
Essential Artwork
Provide at least 1 style-neutral (minimalist) theme for the standard packages:
Completed:
- Framebuffer logo
- SLiM
- Qingy
- Splashy
Pending:
- GDM
- KDM
- XDM