Difference between revisions of "Talk:System maintenance"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(discuss deletion proposal)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:Good idea, I'd prefer merging [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Maintaining_Arch]] here and properly linking the two articles with each other. Note however that some further reorganization should probably be done, in fact sections like [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Subscribe_to_NVD.2FCVE_alerts_and_only_upgrade_on_a_security_alert]] should stay in [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 02:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 
:Good idea, I'd prefer merging [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Maintaining_Arch]] here and properly linking the two articles with each other. Note however that some further reorganization should probably be done, in fact sections like [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Subscribe_to_NVD.2FCVE_alerts_and_only_upgrade_on_a_security_alert]] should stay in [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 02:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
=== Deletion proposal ===
 +
 +
This is a continuation of [[#Merge?]] above (the article has been marked for deletion).
 +
 +
I agree that this article is currently duplicating others, however I like the idea of having an article dedicated to maintenance (it's also linked from [[General recommendations]]).
 +
 +
The "Error checking" section wouldn't have a much better place to be moved to, maybe [[General Troubleshooting]].
 +
 +
It's true that the "Package tasks" section duplicates [[Pacman Tips#Maintenance]], but since [[Pacman Tips]] is already very long and has a title which could be considered a bit generic, why not do the opposite merge and move that section here?
 +
 +
Then, as stated in [[#Merge?]], almost all [[Enhancing_Arch_Linux_stability#Maintaining_Arch]] could be merged here.
 +
 +
Finally, if we decide to keep it, it should probably be renamed to simply [[System maintenance]].
 +
 +
What do you think? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 10:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
  
 
== Outdated 'Error Checking' section? ==
 
== Outdated 'Error Checking' section? ==

Revision as of 10:11, 12 May 2014

Merge?

Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Maintaining_Arch is a part of an article about stability, so it suggest using e.g. linux-lts, which is not necessary if we talk about maintenance.

We should decide whether we merge this article into Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability or do we move the maintenance part here. -- Karol (talk) 19:18, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Good idea, I'd prefer merging Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Maintaining_Arch here and properly linking the two articles with each other. Note however that some further reorganization should probably be done, in fact sections like Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability#Subscribe_to_NVD.2FCVE_alerts_and_only_upgrade_on_a_security_alert should stay in Enhancing_Arch_Linux_Stability. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Deletion proposal

This is a continuation of #Merge? above (the article has been marked for deletion).

I agree that this article is currently duplicating others, however I like the idea of having an article dedicated to maintenance (it's also linked from General recommendations).

The "Error checking" section wouldn't have a much better place to be moved to, maybe General Troubleshooting.

It's true that the "Package tasks" section duplicates Pacman Tips#Maintenance, but since Pacman Tips is already very long and has a title which could be considered a bit generic, why not do the opposite merge and move that section here?

Then, as stated in #Merge?, almost all Enhancing_Arch_Linux_stability#Maintaining_Arch could be merged here.

Finally, if we decide to keep it, it should probably be renamed to simply System maintenance.

What do you think? -- Kynikos (talk) 10:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Outdated 'Error Checking' section?

It mentions 'errors.log' and 'everything.log' which do not exist on my shiny new install (2014-03-20). I'm guessing a recommendation to check journalctl -b is more appropriate these days? (I'm a total Arch noob, so not sure) Scottt (talk) 10:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

+1 for adding journalctl info here. Could you help to add it? --Fengchao (talk) 12:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)