Difference between revisions of "Talk:Systemd-nspawn"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Rename page?: + note)
(Rename page?: re)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
::::For completeness, there is also [[lxc-systemd]].
 
::::For completeness, there is also [[lxc-systemd]].
 
::::-- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 
::::-- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::::Having systemd twice in the URL would indeed be tedious, I did not picture that. Makes good sense to distinguish whether subpage or page like that.
 +
:::::--[[User:Indigo|Indigo]] ([[User talk:Indigo|talk]]) 10:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:10, 22 March 2014

Rename page?

Wouldn't it be better to rename this page to systemd-nspawn? This page is mostly about this tool, so I think it is the better title. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Note that the page contained an invalid DISPLAYTITLE entry: [1] -- Lahwaacz (talk) 19:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, I guess it's ok, it would also give Linux Containers a clearer role as a generic intro to containers (only theoretical, just planned in its current Stub template note). -- Kynikos (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
I like the suggestion. Good structure forward to group systemd-* toolset articles like that for the wiki. One question which arises with "systemd" themes though is when they are better served by a systemd subpage and when titled as an affiliated article (I'm sure you have covered that somewhere else before; I was looking at the systemd related links in consideration). The stub template note you refer to makes a good plan as well (one might group it under world domination plans at the same time:) Following that approach you could move and reverse redirect of this page to systemd-nspawn sometime and move/point to Linux Containers/systemd-nspawn once the stub and Linux Containers/LXC is in place. The latter being a grouping according to functionality rather than project/packaging.
--Indigo (talk) 01:43, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The main reason why I prefer systemd-nspawn over systemd/systemd-nspawn is that it seems unnecessary to repeat "systemd" twice, separated just by "/" (there is no such problem for systemd/User). Grouping by the "Related articles" box should be enough.
If you really want to group the articles in a subpage, I would prefer Linux Containers/systemd-nspawn anyway, because the subpages of systemd would cover half of the wiki already :)
For completeness, there is also lxc-systemd.
-- Lahwaacz (talk) 07:46, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
Having systemd twice in the URL would indeed be tedious, I did not picture that. Makes good sense to distinguish whether subpage or page like that.
--Indigo (talk) 10:10, 22 March 2014 (UTC)