Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firefox/Profile on RAM"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Merge.)
(Merge: re)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
== Merge ==
 
== Merge ==
 +
 
I will give my -1 for merge with Firefox. Both page are quite long. Keep them seperate will make maintaince easier. --[[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 07:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 
I will give my -1 for merge with Firefox. Both page are quite long. Keep them seperate will make maintaince easier. --[[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 07:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Um yeah, -1 also from me because it wouldn't make sense to merge this but leave [[Firefox tweaks]] on its own, and the 3 put together would make too much of a long article.
 +
:The title should be changed to [[Firefox ramdisk]], or maybe something different like [[Firefox on RAM]]?
 +
:-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 03:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:17, 15 September 2014

Why not just use 'cp', or 'mv' commands in /etc/rc.local and /etc/rc.local.shutdown? Adamlau 18:04, 22 September 2010 (EDT)

Isn't 2.1 a bit out of date now that we have the browser.cache.memory.enable setting? Jamie Kitson (talk) 19:00, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

How about pointing out a few drawbacks like "putting browser profile into /tmp poses a security risk --- other users can now see it?" All3fox (talk) 07:17, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


I think this line

volatile=/dev/shm/firefox-$USER

in the script should be changed to

volatile=/dev/shm/firefox-${whoami}

, or the CRON job will fail, because $USER is not set. But as I'm using another distro I don't know wheter it is working in ARCH, so I won't change that line now. Hope I get some feedback here. Kovacssanya (talk) 10:33, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Merge

I will give my -1 for merge with Firefox. Both page are quite long. Keep them seperate will make maintaince easier. --Fengchao (talk) 07:42, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Um yeah, -1 also from me because it wouldn't make sense to merge this but leave Firefox tweaks on its own, and the 3 put together would make too much of a long article.
The title should be changed to Firefox ramdisk, or maybe something different like Firefox on RAM?
-- Kynikos (talk) 03:17, 15 September 2014 (UTC)