Difference between revisions of "Talk:ATI"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Talk:ATI Radeon & Kernel 2.6 moved to Talk:ATI: Naming conventions)
(configuration details)
Line 1: Line 1:
== I think this page should be renamed ==
+
== Configuration instructions 2008/07 ==
 +
Kudos to PCMan for adding detailed instructions on proper xorg.conf troubleshooting, but I'm wondering how necessary it is.  If users run <tt>hwd -x</tt> to generate their configs (instead of <tt>Xorg -configure</tt>) all of the necessary items ''are'' added to xorg.conf automatically, making the bulk of the new information unnecessary.
  
To simply ''ATI Radeon'' or even just ''ATI''.  Since there currently isn't a standalone page for ATI Radeon, this wiki should be it. What does everyone think?
+
Is there a reason we don't instruct users to run <tt>hwd</tt> to generate the xorg.conf files?
--[[User:Thayer.w|Thayer]] Sat Aug 11 09:45:22 PDT 2007
+
  
== Move the OLD Version to an extra Article? ==
+
--[[User:Thayer|Thayer]] @ 2008/07/02
 
+
Shouldn't be the old Version of the article moved to an extra Article to conserve the informations but make the current post more clear?
+
Just a suggestion
+
--[[User:Phxx|Phxx]] 14:01, 15 March 2006 (EST)
+

Revision as of 19:04, 2 July 2008

Configuration instructions 2008/07

Kudos to PCMan for adding detailed instructions on proper xorg.conf troubleshooting, but I'm wondering how necessary it is. If users run hwd -x to generate their configs (instead of Xorg -configure) all of the necessary items are added to xorg.conf automatically, making the bulk of the new information unnecessary.

Is there a reason we don't instruct users to run hwd to generate the xorg.conf files?

--Thayer @ 2008/07/02