Difference between revisions of "Talk:Alternative DNS services"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Future of the page: re new section)
(Future of the page: strong KEEP !)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
::::I also think so, then some information of the DNS Alternative page could be used in this new section in [[Domain name resolution]]. --[[User:Kewl|Kewl]] ([[User talk:Kewl|talk]]) 19:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 
::::I also think so, then some information of the DNS Alternative page could be used in this new section in [[Domain name resolution]]. --[[User:Kewl|Kewl]] ([[User talk:Kewl|talk]]) 19:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::::wikipedia clearly is an '''unreliable''' source. The ArchWiki can do better than that! Keep the article! Once a real good ARCH package for OpenNIC is shipped with major distros, OpenNIC will become more important! [[User:UBF6|UBF6]] ([[User talk:UBF6|talk]]) 09:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:03, 20 November 2018

Future of the page

Another alternative could be to refocus this page on Arch solutions and non-commercial DNS. -- Kewl (talk) 18:42, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

What are "Arch solutions"? --Larivact (talk) 18:48, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
This is an open question, we may present ways to select the most secure and fastest DNS for a given location using Arch tools for example. -- Kewl (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
Such information could be incorporated into Domain name resolution. --Larivact (talk) 19:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
I also think so, then some information of the DNS Alternative page could be used in this new section in Domain name resolution. --Kewl (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
wikipedia clearly is an unreliable source. The ArchWiki can do better than that! Keep the article! Once a real good ARCH package for OpenNIC is shipped with major distros, OpenNIC will become more important! UBF6 (talk) 09:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)