Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch-based distributions"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Trademark infringements: another violation, by Reborn OS, on screenshots)
(More historical detail: new section)
Line 18: Line 18:
  
 
::Thank you. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 17:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 
::Thank you. -- [[User:Alad|Alad]] ([[User talk:Alad|talk]]) 17:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
== More historical detail ==
 +
 +
I was thinking about adding more historical detail like year of first release and previous names:
 +
 +
* [https://sourceforge.net/projects/antergos/ Antergos] <sup>*2012, previosly Cinnarch</sup>
 +
 +
This would give just enough clarity how some of distribution "disappeared" and would complement last release "death" year.
 +
 +
This superscript would only be added if distributions had releases for more than same year or were released under different names.
 +
 +
-- [[User:Svito|Svito]] ([[User talk:Svito|talk]]) 20:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:02, 15 July 2018

Trademark infringements

I've removed the following projects from this article since they appear to misuse the Arch Linux trademark:

  • 3du Arch, [1]
  • ArchBang, [2], [3]
  • Arch Rescue Kit, [4]
  • Arch USB OS, [5]
  • ArchMerge, update
  • Arch Anywhere, update
  • Artix Linux
  • Happy Hacking Linux, [6]
  • Reborn OS, [7]on screenshots
  • SwagArch
  • Zen Installer, [8]

See [9] for the email I've sent on this regard to trademarks@archlinux.org. If I get a response that said distributions have authorization to use the Arch Linux trademark, they can be readded to this article. -- Alad (talk) 11:42, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

Artix Linux[10] has now changed its tag-line from "Your Arch, your init" to "Your GNU/Linux, your init", and so, is no longer in violation of the TrademarkPolicy. The entry has been added back. —This unsigned comment is by Drumal (talk) 07:13, 30 September 2017‎. Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
Thank you. -- Alad (talk) 17:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

More historical detail

I was thinking about adding more historical detail like year of first release and previous names:

This would give just enough clarity how some of distribution "disappeared" and would complement last release "death" year.

This superscript would only be added if distributions had releases for more than same year or were released under different names.

-- Svito (talk) 20:02, 15 July 2018 (UTC)