Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch Build System"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(A suggestion: rm closed discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== "The ABS tree is a SVN hirearchy" ==
  
 +
This gets mentioned repeatedly throughout this article. I think this might actually be outdated - I recall talk on the mailing lists months back about a Git migration, and the packages are definitely [https://projects.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/ available through Git now]. But apparently there's also [https://www.archlinux.org/svn/ SVN repositories]. So which is it? Regardless, I don't think it's accurate to say "ABS is a SVN hirearchy at {{ic|/var/abs}}" unless it actually ''is'' a SVN hierarchy located at {{ic|/var/abs}}. If it's just a bunch of scripts pulled via {{ic|rsync}}, but they happen to come from a SVN repo, then we shouldn't be calling the client's directory tree a SVN tree. [[User:Ndt|Ndt]] ([[User talk:Ndt|talk]]) 16:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:57, 13 August 2014

"The ABS tree is a SVN hirearchy"

This gets mentioned repeatedly throughout this article. I think this might actually be outdated - I recall talk on the mailing lists months back about a Git migration, and the packages are definitely available through Git now. But apparently there's also SVN repositories. So which is it? Regardless, I don't think it's accurate to say "ABS is a SVN hirearchy at /var/abs" unless it actually is a SVN hierarchy located at /var/abs. If it's just a bunch of scripts pulled via rsync, but they happen to come from a SVN repo, then we shouldn't be calling the client's directory tree a SVN tree. Ndt (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)