Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch Build System"
(→A suggestion: rm closed discussion)
|Line 1:||Line 1:|
Revision as of 16:57, 13 August 2014
"The ABS tree is a SVN hirearchy"
This gets mentioned repeatedly throughout this article. I think this might actually be outdated - I recall talk on the mailing lists months back about a Git migration, and the packages are definitely available through Git now. But apparently there's also SVN repositories. So which is it? Regardless, I don't think it's accurate to say "ABS is a SVN hirearchy at
/var/abs" unless it actually is a SVN hierarchy located at
/var/abs. If it's just a bunch of scripts pulled via
rsync, but they happen to come from a SVN repo, then we shouldn't be calling the client's directory tree a SVN tree. Ndt (talk) 16:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)