Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch packaging standards"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add note)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
What encoding (ascii ? UTF-8 ?) should be used for text files in submitted packages ? --[[User:Airbag|Airbag]] 13:43, 15 August 2006 (PDT)
 +
 +
 
I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it ''was'' quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --[[User:Neotuli|Neotuli]] 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)
 
I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it ''was'' quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --[[User:Neotuli|Neotuli]] 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)
  
 
Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]] 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)
 
Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]] 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)
 
* Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]]
 
* Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]]

Revision as of 20:43, 15 August 2006

What encoding (ascii ? UTF-8 ?) should be used for text files in submitted packages ? --Airbag 13:43, 15 August 2006 (PDT)


I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it was quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --Neotuli 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --WillySilly 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)

  • Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --WillySilly