Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch packaging standards"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
  
Added PKGBUILD prototype from CVS. Apparently many people don't even know there's a template hence the varying substandard pkgbuilds being submitted to the AUR. Also moved the etiquette subsection to the top since it contains more important information. [[User:Tardo|tardo]] 22:32, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
+
* Added PKGBUILD prototype from CVS. Apparently many people don't even know there's a template hence the varying substandard pkgbuilds being submitted to the AUR. Also moved the etiquette subsection to the top since it contains more important information. [[User:Tardo|tardo]] 22:32, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 02:35, 24 June 2007

What encoding (ascii ? UTF-8 ?) should be used for text files in submitted packages ? --Airbag 13:43, 15 August 2006 (PDT)


I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it was quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --Neotuli 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --WillySilly 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)

  • Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --WillySilly


  • Added PKGBUILD prototype from CVS. Apparently many people don't even know there's a template hence the varying substandard pkgbuilds being submitted to the AUR. Also moved the etiquette subsection to the top since it contains more important information. tardo 22:32, 23 June 2007 (EDT)