Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch packaging standards"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
* The only section currently NOT included in the [[Building Packages in Arch Linux]] entry is everything below 2. Additional Guidelines. That can easily be merged in. [[User:Rcoyner|Rcoyner]] 14:28, 26 Sept 2008 (EDT)
 
* The only section currently NOT included in the [[Building Packages in Arch Linux]] entry is everything below 2. Additional Guidelines. That can easily be merged in. [[User:Rcoyner|Rcoyner]] 14:28, 26 Sept 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
[[Arch_Packaging_Standards#PKGBUILD_Prototype|PKGBUILD_Prototype]]
 +
* Shouldn't the url be prepended to the package name? Does not work for me without.--[[User:Tantalum|Tantalum]] 17:17, 24 September 2009 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:17, 24 September 2009

What encoding (ascii ? UTF-8 ?) should be used for text files in submitted packages ? --Airbag 13:43, 15 August 2006 (PDT)


I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it was quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --Neotuli 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --WillySilly 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)

  • Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --WillySilly


  • Added PKGBUILD prototype from CVS. Apparently many people don't even know there's a template hence the varying substandard pkgbuilds being submitted to the AUR. Also moved the etiquette subsection to the top since it contains more important information. tardo 22:32, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
  • The only section currently NOT included in the Building Packages in Arch Linux entry is everything below 2. Additional Guidelines. That can easily be merged in. Rcoyner 14:28, 26 Sept 2008 (EDT)


PKGBUILD_Prototype

  • Shouldn't the url be prepended to the package name? Does not work for me without.--Tantalum 17:17, 24 September 2009 (EDT)