Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch packaging standards"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add note)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]] 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)
 
Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]] 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)
 +
* Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --[[User:WillySilly|WillySilly]]

Revision as of 02:12, 19 April 2006

I hope you didn't change my addition because you thought I was bullshitting the name of the document and section number I got that from, because it was quoted straight from a developer's documentation of that name, and from that section. Righto, carry on, just curious... --Neotuli 09:40, 15 Aug 2005 (EDT)

Shouldn't the License section be updated to reflect that the licensing system is in place and ready for users? --WillySilly 14:52, 12 Apr 2006 (PST)

  • Also, should the MIT license fall under the BSD exception? --WillySilly