Difference between revisions of "Talk:Arch User Repository"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(remove dated talk)
(merge with AUR?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Merge with [[Arch User Repository]] ==
 +
 +
Are there any objections to merging this article with the [[Arch User Repository]] article? It seems odd to redirect users to a separate "usage" page.
 +
 +
-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 15:21, 12 March 2010 (EST)
 +
 
== Removing / changing the part about [community] ==
 
== Removing / changing the part about [community] ==
  

Revision as of 20:21, 12 March 2010

Merge with Arch User Repository

Are there any objections to merging this article with the Arch User Repository article? It seems odd to redirect users to a separate "usage" page.

-- pointone 15:21, 12 March 2010 (EST)

Removing / changing the part about [community]

IMO this whole part should just be removed now that community have been seperated from aur. But as a minimum it should be cleaned up, since there have been cases where it have confused users rather than help them:

Perhaps something like:
...
The [community] repo is enabled by default in pacman.conf. If disabled/removed, it can be enabled by uncommenting/adding these two lines: Template:File ...
Any typos would have to be fixed of course :p
Is community still disabled by default in abs.conf btw?

Mr.Elendig 21:37, 21 November 2009 (EST)

I don't think the [community] section should be removed; improved, maybe. Where does this confusion arise from? What do you mean by "separated from AUR"? My understanding is that they are very much connected.
-- pointone 22:33, 23 January 2010 (EST)

JSON

There should be some sort of info on the JSON interface Daenyth 20:10, 29 November 2009 (EST)