Difference between revisions of "Help talk:Article naming guidelines"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Added suggestion to re-evaluate the recommenced suffix)
 
(Translated article title conventions: matching by arbitrary number: Remove closed discussion.)
(16 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Opinions =
+
== Article title capitalization ==
  
==Article type suffix==
+
I think this page should contain capitalization guidelines for the titles of the articles. --[[User:Liquen|Liquen]] 03:42, 15 December 2011 (EST)
 
+
:I agree. I'd say the [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Article_titles#Article_title_format|Wikipedia policy]] is a good start. ~ [[User:Filam|Filam]] ([[User talk:Filam|talk]]) 14:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Should Article type suffix really be recommended?  Working with the Gentoo Wiki I remember almost everybody began naming their articles "HOWTO Dnsmasq" or "Compiz HOWTO". Because this is an instructional-wiki could we consider this implied?  Also since there are table of content tags available this seems to be repetative. Possibly this would be better to call it Naming Suggestions for pages that aren't howtos?  For example, "AUR Guidelines" and "Virtual Machine FAQ".  --[[User:Gen2ly|Gen2ly]] 08:36, 19 June 2009 (EDT)
+
::This topic was being discussed also in [[Help talk:Style#Title case]], and it seems there is some divergence of opinions, can we continue discussing there? :) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:59, 24 October 2012

Article title capitalization

I think this page should contain capitalization guidelines for the titles of the articles. --Liquen 03:42, 15 December 2011 (EST)

I agree. I'd say the Wikipedia policy is a good start. ~ Filam (talk) 14:53, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
This topic was being discussed also in Help talk:Style#Title case, and it seems there is some divergence of opinions, can we continue discussing there? :) -- Kynikos (talk) 11:48, 5 July 2012 (UTC)