Difference between revisions of "Talk:Automatic login to virtual console"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Service Type)
(Killing X: rm closed discussion)
(21 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Service Type ==
You were probably expecting for talk about the merge request but that's not what you're getting here.
I changed the [[Automatic_login_to_virtual_console#With_systemd|#With systemd]] section's service {{ic|Type}} to {{ic|simple}} (the default) to drastically speed up the boot. I went from 12.4 seconds to 7.2 once I figured out what it was.
And no, this is not a hack to simply skip all the other stuff you'd wanna boot with. Even the default display manager services and the (unrecommended) [[Systemd#Using_service_file|xinit method]] were much faster, which is why I started to look for what was wrong with this (_recommended_) one. --[[User:Det|Det]] ([[User talk:Det|talk]]) 21:31, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
:'''Issues with {{ic|logind}} and {{ic|systemctl}} shutdown/reboot'''
:Using this command should result in the system shutting down if only 1 user is currently logged in, but combined with this method for automatically logging in, it will refuse with {{ic|"Failed to issue method call: Access denied"}}. The {{ic|journalctl}} log files get butchered on my system so all I can see is something about dbus getting rejected. --[[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 22:34, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
::Hmh. I have no idea what that means. I just tried starting X as root on another console and launching dolphin with {{ic|dbus-launch}} (of which I have no idea whether it's relevant or not) and I still could shutdown my system from my regular user account.
::But so is the {{ic|1=Type=idle}} method equally fast for you when compared to a display manager or the xinit method? Because if it's not, then why would you want to use that anyway? --[[User:Det|Det]] ([[User talk:Det|talk]]) 10:34, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:15, 18 February 2013