Difference between revisions of "Talk:Blueman"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(lp group? really?: re)
(Not in official repos: new section)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:I can't answer, but for reference [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bluetooth&diff=prev&oldid=191851] is the edit that added that paragraph. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 02:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 
:I can't answer, but for reference [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Bluetooth&diff=prev&oldid=191851] is the edit that added that paragraph. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 02:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Not in official repos ==
 +
 +
Blueman seems not to be in official repos as the article suggests:
 +
 +
<pre>[root@Piki-PC ~]# pacman -Ss blueman
 +
[root@Piki-PC ~]# pacman -Syu blueman
 +
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 +
core is up to date
 +
extra is up to date
 +
community is up to date
 +
multilib is up to date
 +
error: target not found: blueman</pre>
 +
 +
AFAIK the repos mentioned by pacman above are ''all'' the official Arch repos (unless you count AUR and the testing repos), so this begs the question: is the article wrong, or did pacman get high off of pellets and misplace the package?

Revision as of 23:31, 1 December 2013

lp group? really?

Anyone can confirm the statement:

In order for a user to add and manage Bluetooth devices using Blueman, the user must be added to the 'lp' group. See /etc/dbus-1/system.d/bluetooth.conf for the section that enables users of the 'lp' group to communicate with the Bluetooth daemon.

CUPS group as mandatory sounds a bit odd in this context.

-- Flu (talk) 20:54, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

I can't answer, but for reference [1] is the edit that added that paragraph. -- Kynikos (talk) 02:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Not in official repos

Blueman seems not to be in official repos as the article suggests:

[root@Piki-PC ~]# pacman -Ss blueman
[root@Piki-PC ~]# pacman -Syu blueman
:: Synchronizing package databases...
 core is up to date
 extra is up to date
 community is up to date
 multilib is up to date
error: target not found: blueman

AFAIK the repos mentioned by pacman above are all the official Arch repos (unless you count AUR and the testing repos), so this begs the question: is the article wrong, or did pacman get high off of pellets and misplace the package?