Difference between revisions of "Talk:Browser plugins"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Custom udev rules removal: fix my signature ...)
(Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded: new section)
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 09:21, 20 January 2010 (EST)
 
-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 09:21, 20 January 2010 (EST)
 
==RDFM==
 
followed the guide and so it has erased my Tea-plugins;
 
i hope to be in error, but i think this guide is out of date (firefox till now is 3.6 not 3.0)
 
-- [[User:Ahel|ahel]] 2 December 2010
 
 
:Can you be any more specific? What part of the guide? -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 19:48, 2 December 2010 (EST)
 
 
::sorry man,-please- my f*cking fault.[[User:Ahel|Ahel] 6 December 2010
 
  
 
==Permissions of /usr/bin/mozilla/ going to 700==
 
==Permissions of /usr/bin/mozilla/ going to 700==
Line 35: Line 26:
 
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
 
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
  
== Custom udev rules removal ==
+
== Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded ==
 +
 
 +
To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.
  
Is [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Flash#Flash_blocks_sound_and.2For_delayed_playback this] still a problem in light of [http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000793.html the recent custom udev rules removal]? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 03:36, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
+
Should this be added to the wiki?
:It was [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&action=historysubmit&diff=92346&oldid=91404 added on January 16th 2010]. I think there's no way it's still a problem, since blacklisting snd-pcm-oss is now useless regardless of why you'd do it. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:27, 1 June 2011 (EDT)
+
::[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&diff=143382&oldid=142828 I've changed it "a bit"]. Does anyone know if I need to unload snd_mixer_oss too? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 09:28, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
+
:::To have an answer, you should manage to reproduce the problem. However in the previous version there was no mention of snd_mixer_oss, so I would leave it as it is now. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 05:02, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
+

Revision as of 16:18, 5 November 2012

Relocating Firefox specific content

Should this be moved back into Firefox? Dres 15:40, 16 January 2010 (EST)

The only Firefox-specific content I see is Browser Plugins#Plugins cannot be downloaded; the other troubleshooting tips are valid for other browsers (which tend to use the $MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH as well). This could easily be moved back.
-- pointone 13:04, 19 January 2010 (EST)
I can't personally gage on that, so I delegate to what's been pointed out. Dres 03:25, 23 January 2010 (EST)

TODO: mozplugger

mozplugger certainly deserves mention here.

-- pointone 09:21, 20 January 2010 (EST)

Permissions of /usr/bin/mozilla/ going to 700

While for use they need 755, apparently. Should this be filed as a bug? Jasper1984 08:29, 30 December 2010 (EST)

plugin location

firefox (3.6.13) on arch 64 bit does look at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

instead of

~/mozilla/plugins/ or ~/.mozilla/plugins/

at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work

Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded

To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.

Should this be added to the wiki?