Difference between revisions of "Talk:Browser plugins"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Custom udev rules removal: -)
(Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration: re)
(21 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Relocating Firefox specific content==
+
== plugin location ==
Should this be moved back into [[Firefox]]? [[User:Dres|Dres]] 15:40, 16 January 2010 (EST)
+
  
:The only Firefox-specific content I see is [[Browser Plugins#Plugins cannot be downloaded]]; the other troubleshooting tips are valid for other browsers (which tend to use the <tt>$MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH</tt> as well). This could easily be moved back.
+
firefox (3.6.13) on arch 64 bit does look at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
:-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 13:04, 19 January 2010 (EST)
+
  
::I can't personally gage on that, so I delegate to what's been pointed out. [[User:Dres|Dres]] 03:25, 23 January 2010 (EST)
+
instead of
  
==TODO: mozplugger==
+
~/mozilla/plugins/ or
mozplugger certainly deserves mention here.
+
~/.mozilla/plugins/
  
-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 09:21, 20 January 2010 (EST)
+
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
  
==RDFM==
+
== Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded ==
followed the guide and so it has erased my Tea-plugins;
+
i hope to be in error, but i think this guide is out of date (firefox till now is 3.6 not 3.0)
+
-- [[User:Ahel|ahel]] 2 December 2010
+
  
:Can you be any more specific? What part of the guide? -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 19:48, 2 December 2010 (EST)
+
To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.
  
::sorry man,-please- my f*cking fault.[[User:Ahel|Ahel] 6 December 2010
+
Should this be added to the wiki?
  
==Permissions of /usr/bin/mozilla/ going to 700==
+
== Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration ==
While for use they need 755, apparently. Should this be filed as a bug? [[User:Jasper1984|Jasper1984]] 08:29, 30 December 2010 (EST)
+
  
== plugin location ==
+
The Article states ''For hardware acceleration on Intel/AMD, you can use {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} — VAAPI backend for VDPAU. For AMD you should also install {{AUR|xvba-video}}''.
 +
Can someone clarify that? It's totally unclear to me, which ATI/AMD drivers are meant. I assume, I need xvba-video when I use the catalyst/fglrx driver. What about libvdpau-va-gl? Do I need this when using the open-source radeon-driver? Do I need this if you use catalyst? Or do I need this anyway? [[User:Holzhaus|Holzhaus]] ([[User talk:Holzhaus|talk]]) 21:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  
firefox (3.6.13) on arch 64 bit does look at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
+
:See [[VA-API]], I wonder why it isn't linked from this page... -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 06:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
 
+
instead of
+
 
+
~/mozilla/plugins/ or
+
~/.mozilla/plugins/
+
 
+
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
+
  
== Custom udev rules removal ==
+
::As I understand that page, {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} and {{AUR|xvba-video}} are unnecessary, no matter what driver you use. I will then remove that part from the article and link the page you suggested. [[User:Holzhaus|Holzhaus]] ([[User talk:Holzhaus|talk]]) 08:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  
Is [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Flash#Flash_blocks_sound_and.2For_delayed_playback this] still a problem in light of [http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000793.html the recent custom udev rules removal]? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 03:36, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
+
:::Ah, see also [[Talk:VA-API#VDPAU vs VAAPI relationship]] for the {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} and {{AUR|xvba-video}} detail, they are necessary to support VDPAU through VAAPI on Intel cards and AMD cards with proprietary drivers. However, you've correctly linked to [[VDPAU]], FlashPlayer does not use VAAPI. (Sorry for suggesting the [[VA-API]] link, I noticed [[VDPAU]] later...) -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 09:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
:It was [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&action=historysubmit&diff=92346&oldid=91404 added on January 16th 2010]. I think there's no way it's still a problem, since blacklisting snd-pcm-oss is now useless regardless of why you'd do it. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:27, 1 June 2011 (EDT)
+
::[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&diff=143382&oldid=142828 I've changed it "a bit"]. Does anyone know if I need to unload snd_mixer_oss too? -- !!!!
+

Revision as of 09:19, 27 October 2013

plugin location

firefox (3.6.13) on arch 64 bit does look at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

instead of

~/mozilla/plugins/ or ~/.mozilla/plugins/

at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work

Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded

To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.

Should this be added to the wiki?

Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration

The Article states For hardware acceleration on Intel/AMD, you can use libvdpau-va-glAUR — VAAPI backend for VDPAU. For AMD you should also install xvba-videoAUR. Can someone clarify that? It's totally unclear to me, which ATI/AMD drivers are meant. I assume, I need xvba-video when I use the catalyst/fglrx driver. What about libvdpau-va-gl? Do I need this when using the open-source radeon-driver? Do I need this if you use catalyst? Or do I need this anyway? Holzhaus (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

See VA-API, I wonder why it isn't linked from this page... -- Lahwaacz (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
As I understand that page, libvdpau-va-glAUR and xvba-videoAUR are unnecessary, no matter what driver you use. I will then remove that part from the article and link the page you suggested. Holzhaus (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Ah, see also Talk:VA-API#VDPAU vs VAAPI relationship for the libvdpau-va-glAUR and xvba-videoAUR detail, they are necessary to support VDPAU through VAAPI on Intel cards and AMD cards with proprietary drivers. However, you've correctly linked to VDPAU, FlashPlayer does not use VAAPI. (Sorry for suggesting the VA-API link, I noticed VDPAU later...) -- Lahwaacz (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)