Difference between revisions of "Talk:Browser plugins"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Flashplugin 11.2.202.228-1 Blue Tint and Leaking Overlay: Package includes a workaround to fix this. Close.)
(Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration: re)
(12 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Relocating Firefox specific content==
 
Should this be moved back into [[Firefox]]? [[User:Dres|Dres]] 15:40, 16 January 2010 (EST)
 
 
:The only Firefox-specific content I see is [[Browser Plugins#Plugins cannot be downloaded]]; the other troubleshooting tips are valid for other browsers (which tend to use the <tt>$MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH</tt> as well). This could easily be moved back.
 
:-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 13:04, 19 January 2010 (EST)
 
 
::I can't personally gage on that, so I delegate to what's been pointed out. [[User:Dres|Dres]] 03:25, 23 January 2010 (EST)
 
 
==TODO: mozplugger==
 
mozplugger certainly deserves mention here.
 
 
-- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 09:21, 20 January 2010 (EST)
 
 
==<s>RDFM</s>==
 
followed the guide and so it has erased my Tea-plugins;
 
i hope to be in error, but i think this guide is out of date (firefox till now is 3.6 not 3.0)
 
-- [[User:Ahel|ahel]] 2 December 2010
 
 
:Can you be any more specific? What part of the guide? -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 19:48, 2 December 2010 (EST)
 
 
::sorry man,-please- my f*cking fault.[[User:Ahel|Ahel] 6 December 2010
 
 
==Permissions of /usr/bin/mozilla/ going to 700==
 
While for use they need 755, apparently. Should this be filed as a bug? [[User:Jasper1984|Jasper1984]] 08:29, 30 December 2010 (EST)
 
 
 
== plugin location ==
 
== plugin location ==
  
Line 35: Line 10:
 
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
 
at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work
  
== Custom udev rules removal ==
+
== Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded ==
  
Is [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Flash#Flash_blocks_sound_and.2For_delayed_playback this] still a problem in light of [http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/2011-May/000793.html the recent custom udev rules removal]? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 03:36, 31 May 2011 (EDT)
+
To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.
:It was [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&action=historysubmit&diff=92346&oldid=91404 added on January 16th 2010]. I think there's no way it's still a problem, since blacklisting snd-pcm-oss is now useless regardless of why you'd do it. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:27, 1 June 2011 (EDT)
+
::[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Browser_Plugins&diff=143382&oldid=142828 I've changed it "a bit"]. Does anyone know if I need to unload snd_mixer_oss too? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 09:28, 1 June 2011  (EDT)
+
:::To have an answer, you should manage to reproduce the problem. However in the previous version there was no mention of snd_mixer_oss, so I would leave it as it is now. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 05:02, 2 June 2011 (EDT)
+
  
== <s> Flashplugin 11.2.202.228-1 Blue Tint and Leaking Overlay </s> ==
+
Should this be added to the wiki?
  
The solutions to both of these consist of Nvidia patches/tweaks. Do these issues effect ATi (AMD) GPUs?
+
== Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration ==
  
Blue Tint: [http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2518770&postcount=104]
+
The Article states ''For hardware acceleration on Intel/AMD, you can use {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} — VAAPI backend for VDPAU. For AMD you should also install {{AUR|xvba-video}}''.
 +
Can someone clarify that? It's totally unclear to me, which ATI/AMD drivers are meant. I assume, I need xvba-video when I use the catalyst/fglrx driver. What about libvdpau-va-gl? Do I need this when using the open-source radeon-driver? Do I need this if you use catalyst? Or do I need this anyway? [[User:Holzhaus|Holzhaus]] ([[User talk:Holzhaus|talk]]) 21:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
  
Leaking Overlay: [http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=2514210&postcount=102]
+
:See [[VA-API]], I wonder why it isn't linked from this page... -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 06:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
  
=== Additional blue tint solution ===
+
::As I understand that page, {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} and {{AUR|xvba-video}} are unnecessary, no matter what driver you use. I will then remove that part from the article and link the page you suggested. [[User:Holzhaus|Holzhaus]] ([[User talk:Holzhaus|talk]]) 08:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  
It seems that the [https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=58116 flashplugin-square] package from AUR does not have the Blue Tint problem. Although I've only tested it with libvdpau-git-flashpatch
+
:::Ah, see also [[Talk:VA-API#VDPAU vs VAAPI relationship]] for the {{AUR|libvdpau-va-gl}} and {{AUR|xvba-video}} detail, they are necessary to support VDPAU through VAAPI on Intel cards and AMD cards with proprietary drivers. However, you've correctly linked to [[VDPAU]], FlashPlayer does not use VAAPI. (Sorry for suggesting the [[VA-API]] link, I noticed [[VDPAU]] later...) -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 09:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:19, 27 October 2013

plugin location

firefox (3.6.13) on arch 64 bit does look at /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins

instead of

~/mozilla/plugins/ or ~/.mozilla/plugins/

at least for libnpjp2.so I need to link to the correct /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins for it to work

Blue Tint Flash problem reloaded

To solve the blue tint problem I had to right-click a flash element already running and set (in "preferences") off the hw acceleration, otherwise I had blue tint regardless the libvdpau workaround.

Should this be added to the wiki?

Adobe Flash Player: Hardware acceleration

The Article states For hardware acceleration on Intel/AMD, you can use libvdpau-va-glAUR — VAAPI backend for VDPAU. For AMD you should also install xvba-videoAUR. Can someone clarify that? It's totally unclear to me, which ATI/AMD drivers are meant. I assume, I need xvba-video when I use the catalyst/fglrx driver. What about libvdpau-va-gl? Do I need this when using the open-source radeon-driver? Do I need this if you use catalyst? Or do I need this anyway? Holzhaus (talk) 21:33, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

See VA-API, I wonder why it isn't linked from this page... -- Lahwaacz (talk) 06:48, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
As I understand that page, libvdpau-va-glAUR and xvba-videoAUR are unnecessary, no matter what driver you use. I will then remove that part from the article and link the page you suggested. Holzhaus (talk) 08:58, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Ah, see also Talk:VA-API#VDPAU vs VAAPI relationship for the libvdpau-va-glAUR and xvba-videoAUR detail, they are necessary to support VDPAU through VAAPI on Intel cards and AMD cards with proprietary drivers. However, you've correctly linked to VDPAU, FlashPlayer does not use VAAPI. (Sorry for suggesting the VA-API link, I noticed VDPAU later...) -- Lahwaacz (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2013 (UTC)