Difference between revisions of "Talk:CUPS"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Print button greyed-out in GNOME print dialogs: new section)
m (rm closed discussions)
(13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Kernel modules==
 
==Kernel modules==
 
+
The whole kernel modules section is confusing. Is it mandatory? What exactly should we do?<br>
The whole Kernel modules section is confusing. Is it mandatory? What exactly should we do?
+
-- [[User:Drozzy|Drozzy]] ([[User_talk:Drozzy|talk]]) 10:37, April 10, 2012
 
+
==<s>Other guy</s>==
+
 
+
So, im a begginer on Linux.
+
 
+
By reading this page i couldnt learn how to use CUPS or to print a document in linux.
+
 
+
And its not the fist time i try reading this page.
+
 
+
There is no place saying "the job is done", so i need to keep reading everything, i dont know which parts of the text concerns me and which dont.
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
I mean ok, i must install a lot of things, its done, oh and i have to put "cupsd" on the DAEMONS array in the file /etc/rc.conf
+
 
+
(note that this file (rc.conf) is not cited, which could make even harder for people less experienced than me)
+
 
+
After install all that,...
+
Then what?
+
 
+
Thigs are working now? i can go to my open-office click on print and my printer will be there? what was this all about?
+
 
+
And other thing: I dont want to know about "web interface", im with my printer right next to me!, i just want to use it on linux.
+
 
+
Web Interface tutorial should be separated from the tutorial for normal usb printers, this way it is really confusing.
+
 
+
Well, i will try to read other manuals,
+
 
+
Sorry for my bad english, and for being irritated =P.
+
 
+
:Arch Linux is ''not'' targeted to Linux beginners (and we don't try to hide it at all): Archers never get "irritated" for not managing to make something work at the first attempt, instead they are willing to investigate their issues, trying to understand how it all works "under the hood". If you're not (yet) like this, or you need a ''readily'' working system for e.g. working purposes, I warmly suggest you first gain some experience with a friendlier distribution :) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 09:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
+
 
+
::I said i was sorry =P. Thank you for the revision! The new text is really good! -- [[User:Frox|Frox]] 00:32, 19 Jun 2012 (UTC)
+
 
+
:::So you are the same person as [[User:Garcia]], who started this discussion on 27 April?
+
:::In that case note that the page hasn't changed much since then: [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=CUPS&diff=210250&oldid=199231]. This means that probably it's you who learned more stuff about CUPS and after messing around with it you've understood how to make it work, just like a real Archer! Glad to read you appreciate the article now :D Thanks to all those users who have contributed to writing it so far.
+
:::-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 09:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
+
  
 
== Print button greyed-out in GNOME print dialogs ==
 
== Print button greyed-out in GNOME print dialogs ==
  
 
As suggested by the Arch wiki, I used the  
 
As suggested by the Arch wiki, I used the  
# HostNameLookups Double
+
# HostNameLookups Double
 
option. However, that resulted in following error message:  
 
option. However, that resulted in following error message:  
 
IP lookup failed - connection from localhost closed!
 
IP lookup failed - connection from localhost closed!
Line 52: Line 15:
 
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4070+Qversion:%20-feature
 
http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4070+Qversion:%20-feature
  
Removing the HostNameLookups double form the cups config file resolved my issue. Not sure why this used to solve instead of create problems.
+
Removing the HostNameLookups double form the cups config file resolved my issue. Not sure why this used to solve instead of create problems.<br>
 +
-- [[User:Davidovitch|Davidovitch]] ([[User_talk:Davidovitch|talk]]) 07:24, July 4, 2012‎
 +
 
 +
== Device node permissions ==
 +
 
 +
I got a problem after update of {{pkg|hplip}} / {{pkg|cups}} and foomatic. My printer not working anymore.
 +
 
 +
So I first check possible problems and read section Device node permissions. It's recommended to verify that permissions are 660. It was my case so I am looking to find another solution.
 +
 
 +
After a long time and read I was back to this section. I read also section below Device node permission troubleshooting. As my conf was with well permission I don't really read all carefully. It was the 3rd/4th time before I see the note about 666 permissions. I tried this and it's solved my problem.
 +
 
 +
So I think it would be great to make also a note on Device node permissions about 666. Because my conf look alright as writing in wiki, but in fact not.<br>
 +
-- [[User:Ioo|Ioo]] ([[User_talk:Ioo|talk]]) 19:09, July 19, 2012‎

Revision as of 20:58, 16 December 2012

Kernel modules

The whole kernel modules section is confusing. Is it mandatory? What exactly should we do?
-- Drozzy (talk) 10:37, April 10, 2012

Print button greyed-out in GNOME print dialogs

As suggested by the Arch wiki, I used the

# HostNameLookups Double

option. However, that resulted in following error message: IP lookup failed - connection from localhost closed!

and I wasn't able to add printers via the CUPS web interface (internal server error)

It seems there is an outstanding bug with respect to the HostNameLookups: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4070+Qversion:%20-feature

Removing the HostNameLookups double form the cups config file resolved my issue. Not sure why this used to solve instead of create problems.
-- Davidovitch (talk) 07:24, July 4, 2012‎

Device node permissions

I got a problem after update of hplip / cups and foomatic. My printer not working anymore.

So I first check possible problems and read section Device node permissions. It's recommended to verify that permissions are 660. It was my case so I am looking to find another solution.

After a long time and read I was back to this section. I read also section below Device node permission troubleshooting. As my conf was with well permission I don't really read all carefully. It was the 3rd/4th time before I see the note about 666 permissions. I tried this and it's solved my problem.

So I think it would be great to make also a note on Device node permissions about 666. Because my conf look alright as writing in wiki, but in fact not.
-- Ioo (talk) 19:09, July 19, 2012‎