Difference between revisions of "Talk:CUPS"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Printer driver: add user's signature)
(Unknown option "i": new section)
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
 
== Is libcups really sufficient as a client package ? ==
 
== Is libcups really sufficient as a client package ? ==
  
I can't seem to be able to print in KDE applications (4.9.97) if I only have ''libcups'' installed:  
+
I can't seem to be able to print in KDE applications (4.9.97) if I only have {{Pkg|libcups}} installed:  
  
 
''Could not print the document. Detailed error is "Could not find a suitable binary for printing. Make sure '''CUPS lpr''' binary is available"''
 
''Could not print the document. Detailed error is "Could not find a suitable binary for printing. Make sure '''CUPS lpr''' binary is available"''
  
But /usr/bin/lpr is part of the ''cups'' package... Could it be that KDE requires cups for printing ?
+
But {{ic|/usr/bin/lpr}} is part of the {{Pkg|cups}} package... Could it be that KDE requires cups for printing ?<br>
 
--[[User:Gdebure|Gdebure]] ([[User talk:Gdebure|talk]]) 23:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 
--[[User:Gdebure|Gdebure]] ([[User talk:Gdebure|talk]]) 23:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
  
Line 44: Line 44:
 
[[User:Goodmami|Goodmami]] ([[User talk:Goodmami|talk]]) 04:42, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
 
[[User:Goodmami|Goodmami]] ([[User talk:Goodmami|talk]]) 04:42, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
  
== Gnome Printing Workflow ==
+
== GNOME Printing Workflow ==
In my test Gnome 3.8.1 print workflow no longer requires to install [https://www.archlinux.org/packages/?name=system-config-printer system-config-printer]. It should be removed from this wiki, also i am not sure if lpadmin is required either.
+
In my test, GNOME 3.8.1 print workflow no longer requires to install {{Pkg|system-config-printer}}. It should be removed from this wiki, also i am not sure if lpadmin is required either.
  
 
[[User:Donniezazen|Donniezazen]] ([[User talk:Donniezazen|talk]]) 01:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
 
[[User:Donniezazen|Donniezazen]] ([[User talk:Donniezazen|talk]]) 01:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Line 57: Line 57:
 
:Isn't the listed {{AUR|cndrvcups-lb}} the same? The description says "Canon UFR II / LIPSLX Printer Driver for Linux with support for LBP/iR/MF printers".
 
:Isn't the listed {{AUR|cndrvcups-lb}} the same? The description says "Canon UFR II / LIPSLX Printer Driver for Linux with support for LBP/iR/MF printers".
 
:--[[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 10:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 
:--[[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 10:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Unknown option "i" ==
 +
 +
In the section [[Cups#Command-line_configuration|Command-line configuration]] under "Add a new printer" it says, "The device can be retrieved from the 'lpinfo -i' command." When I run that command I get, 'lpinfo: Unknown option "i"'. -- [[User:Fsckd|fsckd]] ([[User_talk:Fsckd|talk]]) 16:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:28, 30 September 2013

Kernel modules

The whole kernel modules section is confusing. Is it mandatory? What exactly should we do?
-- Drozzy (talk) 10:37, April 10, 2012

Print button greyed-out in GNOME print dialogs

As suggested by the Arch wiki, I used the

# HostNameLookups Double

option. However, that resulted in following error message: IP lookup failed - connection from localhost closed!

and I wasn't able to add printers via the CUPS web interface (internal server error)

It seems there is an outstanding bug with respect to the HostNameLookups: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L4070+Qversion:%20-feature

Removing the HostNameLookups double form the cups config file resolved my issue. Not sure why this used to solve instead of create problems.
-- Davidovitch (talk) 07:24, July 4, 2012‎

Device node permissions

I got a problem after update of hplip / cups and foomatic. My printer not working anymore.

So I first check possible problems and read section Device node permissions. It's recommended to verify that permissions are 660. It was my case so I am looking to find another solution.

After a long time and read I was back to this section. I read also section below Device node permission troubleshooting. As my conf was with well permission I don't really read all carefully. It was the 3rd/4th time before I see the note about 666 permissions. I tried this and it's solved my problem.

So I think it would be great to make also a note on Device node permissions about 666. Because my conf look alright as writing in wiki, but in fact not.
-- Ioo (talk) 19:09, July 19, 2012‎

Is libcups really sufficient as a client package ?

I can't seem to be able to print in KDE applications (4.9.97) if I only have libcups installed:

Could not print the document. Detailed error is "Could not find a suitable binary for printing. Make sure CUPS lpr binary is available"

But /usr/bin/lpr is part of the cups package... Could it be that KDE requires cups for printing ?
--Gdebure (talk) 23:02, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Foomatic not providing drivers?

I don't know if this is a general-enough problem to be put on the wiki, but I was unable to print using my Konica-Minolta PagePro 1350w because the driver was not installed with foomatic. I installed foomatic-db, foomatic-db-engine, and foomatic-filters, and used the CUPS web interface to add the printer and select the recommended min12xxw driver. I was unable to print, and only got uninformative error messages in the logs like "Filter error". The Gnome printer dialog, however, said it was unable to find the driver, so I tried installing it from AUR (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/min12xxw/), after which I was able to print. Why was the driver listed in the CUPS web management interface, but not actually installed? Maybe a note on the wiki will help future users.

Goodmami (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

GNOME Printing Workflow

In my test, GNOME 3.8.1 print workflow no longer requires to install system-config-printer. It should be removed from this wiki, also i am not sure if lpadmin is required either.

Donniezazen (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2013 (UTC)

Printer driver

The link to "ufr2", which points to the AUR, is dead. Is there an up to date link?
-- Jtgd 24 June 2013

Isn't the listed cndrvcups-lbAUR the same? The description says "Canon UFR II / LIPSLX Printer Driver for Linux with support for LBP/iR/MF printers".
--Lonaowna (talk) 10:04, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Unknown option "i"

In the section Command-line configuration under "Add a new printer" it says, "The device can be retrieved from the 'lpinfo -i' command." When I run that command I get, 'lpinfo: Unknown option "i"'. -- fsckd (talk) 16:28, 30 September 2013 (UTC)