Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chromium"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(re)
(SRWare Iron: re)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
:I agree. The only reason I decided not to do it was because there is an AUR package so it seems that there are some people interested in it. But then again; if there are enough users, they can make a separate wiki page. [[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 11:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 
:I agree. The only reason I decided not to do it was because there is an AUR package so it seems that there are some people interested in it. But then again; if there are enough users, they can make a separate wiki page. [[User:Lonaowna|Lonaowna]] ([[User talk:Lonaowna|talk]]) 11:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
::Good call, see also [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Chromium&diff=302258&oldid=301952]. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 15:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:21, 27 February 2014

SRWare Iron

I believe it makes sense to remove every single reference to SRWare Iron since it is completely unnecessary Chromium proprietary fork by fact. Gim (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I agree. The only reason I decided not to do it was because there is an AUR package so it seems that there are some people interested in it. But then again; if there are enough users, they can make a separate wiki page. Lonaowna (talk) 11:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Good call, see also [1]. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)