Difference between revisions of "Talk:Chromium"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(No sound fix: removed closed)
(Development discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== Chromium Development ==
 +
Would it be acceptable to open a subsection on this wiki to talk about how to download and compile from source? It would be straightforward, but since the default python executable for arch is python3 and the depot_tools assume python2, a virtualenv needs to be set up for it to work properly. --[[User:Cabreraalex|Cabreraalex]] ([[User talk:Cabreraalex|talk]]) 23:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 +
 
== libpdf ==
 
== libpdf ==
 
Should the bit about chromium and its pdf plugins be removed, because it appears that in the most recent version, libpdf.so is build in?  I am posting here because I don't know if perhaps it should just be edited, rather than removed altogether.
 
Should the bit about chromium and its pdf plugins be removed, because it appears that in the most recent version, libpdf.so is build in?  I am posting here because I don't know if perhaps it should just be edited, rather than removed altogether.
 
[[User:Rh995|Rh995]] ([[User talk:Rh995|talk]]) 02:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 
[[User:Rh995|Rh995]] ([[User talk:Rh995|talk]]) 02:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 
: My suggestion here is leave a note here such as "Since version xxx, libpdf.so is build in". --[[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 12:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
 
: My suggestion here is leave a note here such as "Since version xxx, libpdf.so is build in". --[[User:Fengchao|Fengchao]] ([[User talk:Fengchao|talk]]) 12:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:29, 21 November 2014

Chromium Development

Would it be acceptable to open a subsection on this wiki to talk about how to download and compile from source? It would be straightforward, but since the default python executable for arch is python3 and the depot_tools assume python2, a virtualenv needs to be set up for it to work properly. --Cabreraalex (talk) 23:29, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

libpdf

Should the bit about chromium and its pdf plugins be removed, because it appears that in the most recent version, libpdf.so is build in? I am posting here because I don't know if perhaps it should just be edited, rather than removed altogether. Rh995 (talk) 02:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

My suggestion here is leave a note here such as "Since version xxx, libpdf.so is build in". --Fengchao (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)