Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cron"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with '==Expansion== I added a couple of sections to this article, trying to touch on the basic configuration, format, and commands of cron and crontab, and thus thought it appropriate…')
 
(Ambiguity?: new section)
(14 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Expansion==
+
== Ambiguity? ==
  
I added a couple of sections to this article, trying to touch on the basic configuration, format, and commands of cron and crontab, and thus thought it appropriate to remove the "expansion" template from the top of the page. I have no idea if this is standard procedure, whether I expanded it to everyone's satisfaction, etc. If anyone has any complaints please fix them, put the expansion template back, berate me, or do whatever needs to be done. Since there was no explanation on this talk page as to what anyone thought needed to be done, I just guessed at what people might want to know. Please let me know if I missed the mark.
+
Under Configuration/Users and autostart, it says:
--[[User:Trey|Trey]] 17:00, 7 March 2010 (EST)
+
<blockquote>In order to use crontab application (editor for job entries), users must be members of a designated group {{ic|users}} <u>or {{ic|root}}, of which all users should already be members</u>. <i>(emphasis mine)</i></blockquote>
 +
This seems rather ambiguous - new users might inadvertently add all users to the "root" group. Perhaps we should change it so {{ic|users}} is listed second? [[User:Pacman|Pacman]] ([[User talk:Pacman|talk]]) 17:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:17, 10 December 2013

Ambiguity?

Under Configuration/Users and autostart, it says:

In order to use crontab application (editor for job entries), users must be members of a designated group users or root, of which all users should already be members. (emphasis mine)

This seems rather ambiguous - new users might inadvertently add all users to the "root" group. Perhaps we should change it so users is listed second? Pacman (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)