Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daemons list"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(re, closing)
(discussing the out of date flag)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
::There's ''always on'' note next to dbus.service, closing. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 
::There's ''always on'' note next to dbus.service, closing. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Out of date==
 +
Regarding the out of date flag, since the article title is not "Initscripts/systemd daemon conversion table" but a more generic "Daemons list", I think listing daemons without an initscripts counterpart could be allowed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:22, 14 August 2013

Should dbus be labeled as automatically handled?

systemctl enable dbus.service

The unit files have no [Install] section. They are not meant to be enabled using systemctl.

JKAbrams 2012-11-01

I agree. According to the error prompted:
3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer, D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...)
--Ortegamarvin (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
There's always on note next to dbus.service, closing. -- Lahwaacz (talk) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Out of date

Regarding the out of date flag, since the article title is not "Initscripts/systemd daemon conversion table" but a more generic "Daemons list", I think listing daemons without an initscripts counterpart could be allowed. -- Kynikos (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)