Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daemons list"
(re, closing) |
(discussing the out of date flag) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::There's ''always on'' note next to dbus.service, closing. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | ::There's ''always on'' note next to dbus.service, closing. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Out of date== | ||
| + | Regarding the out of date flag, since the article title is not "Initscripts/systemd daemon conversion table" but a more generic "Daemons list", I think listing daemons without an initscripts counterpart could be allowed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:22, 14 August 2013
Should dbus be labeled as automatically handled?
systemctl enable dbus.service
The unit files have no [Install] section. They are not meant to be enabled using systemctl.
JKAbrams 2012-11-01
- I agree. According to the error prompted:
- 3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer, D-Bus, udev, scripted systemctl call, ...)
- --Ortegamarvin (talk) 05:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Out of date
Regarding the out of date flag, since the article title is not "Initscripts/systemd daemon conversion table" but a more generic "Daemons list", I think listing daemons without an initscripts counterpart could be allowed. -- Kynikos (talk) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)