Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daemons list"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Out of date: re)
m (Out of date: rm closed discussion)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== <s>Should dbus be labeled as automatically handled?</s> ==
systemctl enable dbus.service
The unit files have no [Install] section. They are not meant to be enabled using systemctl.
''JKAbrams 2012-11-01''
:I agree. According to the error prompted:
:3) A unit may be started when needed via activation (socket, path, timer, '''D-Bus''', udev, scripted systemctl call, ...)
:--[[User:Ortegamarvin|Ortegamarvin]] ([[User talk:Ortegamarvin|talk]]) 05:03, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
::There's ''always on'' note next to dbus.service, closing. -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 07:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
==Out of date==
Regarding the out of date flag, since the article title is not "Initscripts/systemd daemon conversion table" but a more generic "Daemons list", I think listing daemons without an initscripts counterpart could be allowed. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:22, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
:I agree. When the netctl services are added to the list, should the netcfg services ({{ic|net-auto-wireless}} etc.) stay, or be deleted? -- [[User:Lahwaacz|Lahwaacz]] ([[User talk:Lahwaacz|talk]]) 13:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:48, 21 August 2013