Difference between revisions of "Talk:DeveloperWiki:CoreSignoffs"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(re)
(use https for links to archlinux.org)
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Out of date==
 
==Out of date==
At least the package names need updating, the list mentions [http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-June/020824.html gen-init-cpio] and many other deprecated / renamed ones. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 04:47, 10 December 2011 (EST)
+
At least the package names need updating, the list mentions [https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2011-June/020824.html gen-init-cpio] and many other deprecated / renamed ones. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 04:47, 10 December 2011 (EST)
 
:Marked as out of date. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 12:04, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 
:Marked as out of date. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 12:04, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 +
::Thanks. Do we close this discussion? -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 12:10, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 +
:::Um... article status templates should always be accompanied by a discussion in the talk page (add to style rules btw?), let's leave this open ^^ -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 12:16, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 +
::::I'd appreciate adding this rule to the styleguide.
 +
::::Can we add short explanations to the out-of-date template, a bit like the merge template works <nowiki>{{Out of date|Reason}}</nowiki>? It's just an idea, I'm fine with using talk page comments for this. -- [[User:Karol|Karol]] 12:24, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::Definitely, it's been in my [[User:Kynikos/Todo|todo list]] for some time now, I'm just waiting to find the time to implement that, unless somebody gets there sooner ;) I'm also improving Help:Style then. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 12:33, 11 December 2011 (EST)
 +
:::::Discussion about reason argument in [[Category talk:Template#Article_status_reason]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 11:07, 4 March 2012 (EST)

Revision as of 07:12, 28 April 2013

Out of date

At least the package names need updating, the list mentions gen-init-cpio and many other deprecated / renamed ones. -- Karol 04:47, 10 December 2011 (EST)

Marked as out of date. -- Kynikos 12:04, 11 December 2011 (EST)
Thanks. Do we close this discussion? -- Karol 12:10, 11 December 2011 (EST)
Um... article status templates should always be accompanied by a discussion in the talk page (add to style rules btw?), let's leave this open ^^ -- Kynikos 12:16, 11 December 2011 (EST)
I'd appreciate adding this rule to the styleguide.
Can we add short explanations to the out-of-date template, a bit like the merge template works {{Out of date|Reason}}? It's just an idea, I'm fine with using talk page comments for this. -- Karol 12:24, 11 December 2011 (EST)
Definitely, it's been in my todo list for some time now, I'm just waiting to find the time to implement that, unless somebody gets there sooner ;) I'm also improving Help:Style then. -- Kynikos 12:33, 11 December 2011 (EST)
Discussion about reason argument in Category talk:Template#Article_status_reason. -- Kynikos 11:07, 4 March 2012 (EST)