Difference between revisions of "Talk:Direct modem connection"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(discuss title)
 
(Title: re:Kynikos)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Title==
 
==Title==
 
This article has recently been moved from "Internet Access" to "Dialup Access": I'm wondering if this is correct since it has also a little section about DSL. Would doing the opposite, i.e. redirecting Dialup Access to Internet Access be a better solution? What do you think? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 20:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 
This article has recently been moved from "Internet Access" to "Dialup Access": I'm wondering if this is correct since it has also a little section about DSL. Would doing the opposite, i.e. redirecting Dialup Access to Internet Access be a better solution? What do you think? -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 20:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
:Kynikos, that is a good point. Calling it "Internet Access", in my opinion, seems somewhat synonymous with a general "Internet" page, though. What if we called it something along the lines of "Alternative Internet Access", or maybe "Alternative Networking"? Let me know your thoughts. --[[User:Pithdillinja|Pithdillinja]] ([[User talk:Pithdillinja|talk]]) 20:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:29, 8 June 2012

Title

This article has recently been moved from "Internet Access" to "Dialup Access": I'm wondering if this is correct since it has also a little section about DSL. Would doing the opposite, i.e. redirecting Dialup Access to Internet Access be a better solution? What do you think? -- Kynikos (talk) 20:12, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Kynikos, that is a good point. Calling it "Internet Access", in my opinion, seems somewhat synonymous with a general "Internet" page, though. What if we called it something along the lines of "Alternative Internet Access", or maybe "Alternative Networking"? Let me know your thoughts. --Pithdillinja (talk) 20:29, 8 June 2012 (UTC)