Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dotfiles"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Formatting: re)
m (Formatting: typo)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
I undid revision 202148 by Earnest, in my opinion it looks much neater to have things layed out in a table, as opposed to a list format. It's more compact as well. --wolfcore
 
I undid revision 202148 by Earnest, in my opinion it looks much neater to have things layed out in a table, as opposed to a list format. It's more compact as well. --wolfcore
 
:This is still up for review, there is a real danger of things becoming rather bloated. Anyone else who sees this, look over the specific revision and leave a comment on which you'd prefer. Version1, Version2 or the Table layout. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 19:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 
:This is still up for review, there is a real danger of things becoming rather bloated. Anyone else who sees this, look over the specific revision and leave a comment on which you'd prefer. Version1, Version2 or the Table layout. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 19:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
::My opinion is that the table layout is the best solution as it forces a consistent layout for all users; using a list would make users add notes and other stuff that would better fit their user page. This is also why I'd also recommend to add possible notes in each user's home page instead of the "Repo Specific Notes" section, which should be used only for users not registered in the ArchWiki. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 12:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
+
::My opinion is that the table layout is the best solution as it forces a consistent layout for all users; using a list would make users add notes and other stuff that would better fit their user page. This is also why I'd also recommend to add possible notes in each user's page instead of the "Repo Specific Notes" section, which should be used only for users not registered in the ArchWiki. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 12:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
  
 
Added category and summary section. At the moment this is all mock-up and scaffolding, feel free to change in any regard or discuss any potential 'bloat' or redundancy. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 18:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 
Added category and summary section. At the moment this is all mock-up and scaffolding, feel free to change in any regard or discuss any potential 'bloat' or redundancy. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 18:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:09, 21 May 2012

Comment

This page is apparently alphabetical :P --Meskarune (talk) 4:26pm, 18 May 2012

Formatting

I undid revision 202148 by Earnest, in my opinion it looks much neater to have things layed out in a table, as opposed to a list format. It's more compact as well. --wolfcore

This is still up for review, there is a real danger of things becoming rather bloated. Anyone else who sees this, look over the specific revision and leave a comment on which you'd prefer. Version1, Version2 or the Table layout. -- Earnest (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
My opinion is that the table layout is the best solution as it forces a consistent layout for all users; using a list would make users add notes and other stuff that would better fit their user page. This is also why I'd also recommend to add possible notes in each user's page instead of the "Repo Specific Notes" section, which should be used only for users not registered in the ArchWiki. -- Kynikos (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Added category and summary section. At the moment this is all mock-up and scaffolding, feel free to change in any regard or discuss any potential 'bloat' or redundancy. -- Earnest (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Category

According to Help:Style, all articles should be categorized, however the purpose of this article is not very clear to me: if it's aimed at developers/package maintainers it may fit Category:DeveloperWiki. -- Kynikos (talk) 11:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Added to Category:Dotfiles. This page was initially planned as a means to collate many users repos containing their custom configurations. -- Earnest (talk) 18:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Ah, now I get it, thanks. -- Kynikos (talk) 10:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)