Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dotfiles"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Formatting)
(Comment)
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
== Comment ==
 
== Comment ==
 
This page is apparently alphabetical :P --[[User:Meskarune|Meskarune]] ([[User talk:Meskarune|talk]]) 4:26pm, 18 May 2012
 
This page is apparently alphabetical :P --[[User:Meskarune|Meskarune]] ([[User talk:Meskarune|talk]]) 4:26pm, 18 May 2012
 +
 +
I've just updated the page with a link to my post; i'd linked to the post instead of the file for future udates --[[User:Ferran|Ferran]] ([[User talk:Ferran|talk]]) 14:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
  
 
== Formatting ==
 
== Formatting ==
Line 11: Line 13:
 
:Summary section has no real place. Last task at hand might be to include more categories within the table. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 18:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 
:Summary section has no real place. Last task at hand might be to include more categories within the table. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 18:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 
::Too many catagories, this really needs to be a list the grid just doesn't look good at all -- [[User:Danielwallace|Danielwallace]] ([[User talk:Danielwallace|talk]]) 18:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 
::Too many catagories, this really needs to be a list the grid just doesn't look good at all -- [[User:Danielwallace|Danielwallace]] ([[User talk:Danielwallace|talk]]) 18:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
 
==<s>Category</s>==
 
According to [[Help:Style]], all articles should be categorized, however the purpose of this article is not very clear to me: if it's aimed at developers/package maintainers it may fit [[:Category:DeveloperWiki]]. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 11:40, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 
 
:Added to [[:Category:Dotfiles]]. This page was initially planned as a means to collate many users repos containing their custom configurations. -- [[User:Earnest|Earnest]] ([[User talk:Earnest|talk]]) 18:52, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
 
 
::Ah, now I get it, thanks. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] ([[User talk:Kynikos|talk]]) 10:28, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 14:59, 31 March 2013

Comment

This page is apparently alphabetical :P --Meskarune (talk) 4:26pm, 18 May 2012

I've just updated the page with a link to my post; i'd linked to the post instead of the file for future udates --Ferran (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Formatting

I undid revision 202148 by Earnest, in my opinion it looks much neater to have things layed out in a table, as opposed to a list format. It's more compact as well. --wolfcore

This is still up for review, there is a real danger of things becoming rather bloated. Anyone else who sees this, look over the specific revision and leave a comment on which you'd prefer. Version1, Version2 or the Table layout. -- Earnest (talk) 19:50, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
My opinion is that the table layout is the best solution as it forces a consistent layout for all users; using a list would make users add notes and other stuff that would better fit their user page. This is also why I'd also recommend to add possible notes in each user's page instead of the "Repo Specific Notes" section, which should be used only for users not registered in the ArchWiki. -- Kynikos (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Added category and summary section. At the moment this is all mock-up and scaffolding, feel free to change in any regard or discuss any potential 'bloat' or redundancy. -- Earnest (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Summary section has no real place. Last task at hand might be to include more categories within the table. -- Earnest (talk) 18:08, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Too many catagories, this really needs to be a list the grid just doesn't look good at all -- Danielwallace (talk) 18:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)