Difference between revisions of "Talk:E17"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (removed prior comment, edited wiki myself.)
(check poorly writen paragraph)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 
Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
=== Check This paragraphs===
 +
there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.
 +
 +
[[E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17]]
 +
 +
[[E17#What is the Places module ]]
 +
 +
[[E17#A solution or workaround for "Places" ]]
 +
 +
It is poorly writen and i think  should be merged into a single paragraph. [[User:Veleno77|Veleno]] 06:36, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:36, 10 October 2011

Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown. As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.

Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... Lastebil 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)


Check This paragraphs

there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.

E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17

E17#What is the Places module

E17#A solution or workaround for "Places"

It is poorly writen and i think should be merged into a single paragraph. Veleno 06:36, 10 October 2011 (EDT)