Difference between revisions of "Talk:E17"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(re)
m (Check This paragraphs)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
=== Check This paragraphs===
 
=== Check This paragraphs===
there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.  
+
<s>there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.  
  
 
[[E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17]]
 
[[E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17]]
Line 18: Line 18:
 
:::However, just to make it clear, all constructive contributions are welcome, even if poorly written ;) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:20, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 
:::However, just to make it clear, all constructive contributions are welcome, even if poorly written ;) -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 16:20, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
 
:I re-read what I typed in the middle of the night, and I agree with you both that it was poorly written.  So I just went back and tried to improve it.  I could not get it into one paragraph, though.  As a matter of fact, I felt like it needed even more explanation.  Hope that helps. -- [[User:vsingleton|vsingleton]] 07:41, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
 
:I re-read what I typed in the middle of the night, and I agree with you both that it was poorly written.  So I just went back and tried to improve it.  I could not get it into one paragraph, though.  As a matter of fact, I felt like it needed even more explanation.  Hope that helps. -- [[User:vsingleton|vsingleton]] 07:41, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
::I rewrited the paragraph. [[E17#A_workaround_that_gets_Places_working]] I deleted the redundant procedures (the procedures should be acknowledged). I add the template style. for me it is visually better. Now check the translation, and if it is correct you can delete this thread. [[User:Veleno77|Veleno]] 12:06, 12 November 2011 (EST)
+
::I rewrited the paragraph. [[E17#A_workaround_that_gets_Places_working]] I deleted the redundant procedures (the procedures should be acknowledged). I add the template style. for me it is visually better. Now check the translation, and if it is correct you can delete this thread. [[User:Veleno77|Veleno]] 12:06, 12 November 2011 (EST)</s>
 
:::[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=E17&action=historysubmit&diff=169856&oldid=169765 Adapted] installation instructions to [[Help:Style#AUR packages]].
 
:::[https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=E17&action=historysubmit&diff=169856&oldid=169765 Adapted] installation instructions to [[Help:Style#AUR packages]].
 
:::Before deleting a discussion it should be closed by striking its heading with &lt;s> tags, see [[Help:Style#Discussion pages]].
 
:::Before deleting a discussion it should be closed by striking its heading with &lt;s> tags, see [[Help:Style#Discussion pages]].
 
:::-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:22, 13 November 2011 (EST)
 
:::-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 08:22, 13 November 2011 (EST)
 +
:::: Great job, now this paragraphs reflecting a good write.[[User:Veleno77|Veleno]] 13:34, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Revision as of 18:34, 13 November 2011

Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown. As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.

Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... Lastebil 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Check This paragraphs

there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.

E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17

E17#What is the Places module

E17#A solution or workaround for "Places"

It is poorly writen and i think should be merged into a single paragraph. Veleno 06:36, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Improved a bit. -- Kynikos 07:41, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
I am an Italian user, I hope that my words do not seem to be offensive. That said, for example in Section E17#A solution or workaround for "Places" smiley faces and words (Yay!) are not appropriate for a wiki. I have not corrected because they are not a native English speaker. sorry Veleno 09:56, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
There's nothing offensive in your words :D You're right, I've removed the informal expressions, but the section remains poorly written and formatted.
However, just to make it clear, all constructive contributions are welcome, even if poorly written ;) -- Kynikos 16:20, 12 October 2011 (EDT)
I re-read what I typed in the middle of the night, and I agree with you both that it was poorly written. So I just went back and tried to improve it. I could not get it into one paragraph, though. As a matter of fact, I felt like it needed even more explanation. Hope that helps. -- vsingleton 07:41, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
I rewrited the paragraph. E17#A_workaround_that_gets_Places_working I deleted the redundant procedures (the procedures should be acknowledged). I add the template style. for me it is visually better. Now check the translation, and if it is correct you can delete this thread. Veleno 12:06, 12 November 2011 (EST)
Adapted installation instructions to Help:Style#AUR packages.
Before deleting a discussion it should be closed by striking its heading with <s> tags, see Help:Style#Discussion pages.
-- Kynikos 08:22, 13 November 2011 (EST)
Great job, now this paragraphs reflecting a good write.Veleno 13:34, 13 November 2011 (EST)