Difference between revisions of "Talk:E17"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(HAL no longer required: comment)
(get-e.org: Remove closed discussion.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown.  As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.
Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
== HAL no longer required ==
== HAL no longer required ==

Revision as of 03:35, 28 November 2012

HAL no longer required

Isn't the section describing the "Places" module relying on HAL out of date? I use the "Places" module without HAL and haven't had any issues.


Also, in my opinion, the section about Modules and Gadgets should not be under troubleshooting.


I don't really know where else it would go but maybe making it a separate main heading would be the best idea. I could add some information about a few of the different modules and their uses.

I just wanted to see what everyone thought before I went ahead changing/adding that. Also, I'd like to confirm that no one else has issues with "Places" still. --Boswbr25 (talk) 02:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

User:Fengchao seems to have solved the HAL issue quite smartly: if you think that's enough please close this discussion by marking its heading with <s> tags. -- Kynikos (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2012 (UTC)