Difference between revisions of "Talk:E17"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(check poorly writen paragraph)
(HAL no longer required: Remove closed discussion.)
(21 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown.  As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.
Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
=== Check This paragraphs===
there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.
[[E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17]]
[[E17#What is the Places module ]]
[[E17#A solution or workaround for "Places" ]]
It is poorly writen and i think  should be merged into a single paragraph. [[User:Veleno77|Veleno]] 06:36, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 05:57, 6 February 2013