|
|
| (6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown. As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.
| |
| | | | |
| − | Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == HAL no longer required ==
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Isn't the section describing the "Places" module relying on HAL out of date? I use the "Places" module without HAL and haven't had any issues.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[E17#udisk_vs._HAL]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Also, in my opinion, the section about Modules and Gadgets should not be under troubleshooting.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | [[E17#Modules_and_gadgets]]
| |
| − |
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I don't really know where else it would go but maybe making it a separate main heading would be the best idea. I could add some information about a few of the different modules and their uses.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I just wanted to see what everyone thought before I went ahead changing/adding that. Also, I'd like to confirm that no one else has issues with "Places" still. --[[User:Boswbr25|Boswbr25]] ([[User talk:Boswbr25|talk]]) 02:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)
| |