Difference between revisions of "Talk:E17"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(rm closed discussion)
(HAL no longer required: Remove closed discussion.)
(6 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Various things that reference get-e.org (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown.  As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of get-e.org) I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.
Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... [[User:Lastebil|Lastebil]] 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)
== HAL no longer required ==
Isn't the section describing the "Places" module relying on HAL out of date? I use the "Places" module without HAL and haven't had any issues.
Also, in my opinion, the section about Modules and Gadgets should not be under troubleshooting. 
I don't really know where else it would go but maybe making it a separate main heading would be the best idea.  I could add some information about a few of the different modules and their uses. 
I just wanted to see what everyone thought before I went ahead changing/adding that.  Also, I'd like to confirm that no one else has issues with "Places" still.  --[[User:Boswbr25|Boswbr25]] ([[User talk:Boswbr25|talk]]) 02:55, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:57, 6 February 2013