From ArchWiki
Revision as of 20:20, 12 October 2011 by Kynikos (talk | contribs) (Check This paragraphs: re)
Jump to: navigation, search

Various things that reference (various aur packages, etc) should be listed as 'outdated' and alternatives shown. As I haven't been paying attention for a month (and thus missed the closing of I missed this; had I not caught that it was closing TODAY I'd be really confused.

Unfortunately I am leaving for a trip in the morning (should be sleeping now) and thus I can't do this immediately... Lastebil 20:38, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Check This paragraphs

there are three paragraphs for one workaround to use hal into E17 environment.

E17#The state of modules and gadgets in e17

E17#What is the Places module

E17#A solution or workaround for "Places"

It is poorly writen and i think should be merged into a single paragraph. Veleno 06:36, 10 October 2011 (EDT)

Improved a bit. -- Kynikos 07:41, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
I am an Italian user, I hope that my words do not seem to be offensive. That said, for example in Section E17#A solution or workaround for "Places" smiley faces and words (Yay!) are not appropriate for a wiki. I have not corrected because they are not a native English speaker. sorry Veleno 09:56, 11 October 2011 (EDT)
There's nothing offensive in your words :D You're right, I've removed the informal expressions, but the section remains poorly written and formatted.
However, just to make it clear, all constructive contributions are welcome, even if poorly written ;) -- Kynikos 16:20, 12 October 2011 (EDT)