Difference between revisions of "Talk:ECryptfs"

From ArchWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎pambase 20120701-1: new section)
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
== pambase 20120701-1 ==
 +
 +
pam.d has changed around. Needs to update to address the new file layout. Have not been able to find documentation on the new layout and where lines should be placed. --[[User:Zkai|Zkai]] ([[User talk:Zkai|talk]]) 13:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 +
 
== Bugs ==
 
== Bugs ==
  
Line 15: Line 19:
  
 
--[[User:Evilandi666|Evilandi666]] 18:19, 20 December 2011 (EST)
 
--[[User:Evilandi666|Evilandi666]] 18:19, 20 December 2011 (EST)
 
== pambase 20120701-1 ==
 
 
pam.d has changed around. Needs to update to address the new file layout. Have not been able to find documentation on the new layout and where lines should be placed. --[[User:Zkai|Zkai]] ([[User talk:Zkai|talk]]) 13:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 13:48, 5 July 2012

pambase 20120701-1

pam.d has changed around. Needs to update to address the new file layout. Have not been able to find documentation on the new layout and where lines should be placed. --Zkai (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Bugs

I've added a warning about potential bugs in ecryptfs. While I have been affected by the bug presented at Launchpad this only happened in Kubuntu and I haven't tried to use ecryptfs ever since. --Roentgen 09:50, 27 March 2011 (EDT)

PAM Mount [New Method]

I tried severel times to implement the pam-mount section and spent hours of testing it. The PAM-Mount described here is not working anymore - I think there is some mistake anywhere in the "PAM_Mount"-Section (I think it is also not complete) or changes in pam_mount. So I searched and found another solution in the forum which is much more easier to set up and works well.
Anrxc dislikes this method - I don't know why but I hope you could add that to the wiki.
I hope you could also try this method - maybe I do something wrong, but I don't think. The error I get is "Error attempting to add filename encryption key to user session keyring; rc = [1]" - even with filename encryption off.
This does not affect Anrxc's solution!
- Evilandi666 03:40, 28 March 2011 (UTC+2)

Today I found out that we do not need pam_mount for ecryptfs home mounting at login by trying in a vm. I thought about it because ecryptfs-utils is now in community and does not depend on pam_mount (which is still in AUR), even in Ubuntu ecryptfs-utils has no dependency on pam_mount. So I removed the installation of pam_mount from the wiki article "PAM Mount [New Method]". I always thought it uses pam_mount becuase of Anrxc's tutorial, but never thought about if the "normal" ecryptfs needs it. Would be nice if someone else could try it: pacman -Rs pam_mount and see if you still can login and got your encrypted $home opened. Thx and sry. for the not necessary package...

--Evilandi666 18:19, 20 December 2011 (EST)