Difference between revisions of "Talk:Eclipse"

From ArchWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m
(sun jdk)
Line 1: Line 1:
= Eclipse crashes with xulrunner 2.x=
+
== Eclipse crashes with xulrunner 2.x==
 
Hi, just installed latest eclipse. It crashed all the time, so I did a bit research:
 
Hi, just installed latest eclipse. It crashed all the time, so I did a bit research:
  
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:::That workaround does not involve symlinking different so versions, which was my main objection. Users should never be told to do that. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
 
:::That workaround does not involve symlinking different so versions, which was my main objection. Users should never be told to do that. -- [[User:Pointone|pointone]] 14:38, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Ah that makes sense, I've understood now. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 15:02, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
 
::::Ah that makes sense, I've understood now. -- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 15:02, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
 +
 +
==Sun JDK==
 +
[[Eclipse#Using_Sun_JDK_in_place_of_OpenJDK|This section]] was added in 2009: I would replace it with a link to [[Java]], agree?
 +
 +
Is [https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php?title=Eclipse&diff=next&oldid=69653 this trick still needed]? If not I'll remove it. (Or move it to [[Java]]?)
 +
 +
-- [[User:Kynikos|Kynikos]] 06:14, 28 June 2011 (EDT)

Revision as of 10:14, 28 June 2011

Eclipse crashes with xulrunner 2.x

Hi, just installed latest eclipse. It crashed all the time, so I did a bit research:

http://www.eclipse.org/swt/faq.php#browserlinux

Eclipse 3.6.x and newer:
Mozilla 1.4 GTK2 - 1.7.x GTK2
XULRunner 1.8.x - 1.9.2.x
WebKitGTK+ 1.2.0 and newer

Here the solution: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=115543

since gnome3 the webkit library name changed from libwebkit-1.0.so to libwebkitgtk-1.0.so, so I did
# cd /usr/lib
# ln -s libwebkitgtk-1.0.so libwebkit-1.0.so.2
and
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.UseWebKitGTK=true
works again

Can u add this to the wiki? -- Der harm 20:16, 6 May 2011 (EDT)

No; please read FIX/FILE BUGS don't IGNORE. -- pointone 22:54, 6 May 2011 (EDT)
Well this workaround has just been added: what now? I'm not against it, although it could be explained much better and report a link to the forum thread. -- Kynikos 05:43, 14 May 2011 (EDT)
That workaround does not involve symlinking different so versions, which was my main objection. Users should never be told to do that. -- pointone 14:38, 16 May 2011 (EDT)
Ah that makes sense, I've understood now. -- Kynikos 15:02, 16 May 2011 (EDT)

Sun JDK

This section was added in 2009: I would replace it with a link to Java, agree?

Is this trick still needed? If not I'll remove it. (Or move it to Java?)

-- Kynikos 06:14, 28 June 2011 (EDT)