|(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)|
e17-themes removal? == |+|
== ? ==
|−|I think the e17-themes package shouldn't be proposed to the new users. It has problems with EFM (at least in my installation: [https:// bbs.archlinux.org/ viewtopic.php? id= 162779 EFM's contents only can be seen with the default theme]. That leads to frustration that could drive potential users away of enlightenment. --[[User:Bruno. unna|Bruno.unna]] ([[User talk:Bruno. unna|talk]]) 23:09, 5 May 2013 (UTC) |+|
be to the in
would have no problem with removing this, but it can be useful. Maybe just a note that some of the themes in the package may not work right? This is why I' m not a fan of "collection" type packages. [[User:Scimmia|Scimmia]] ([[User talk:Scimmia|talk]]) 06: 34, 6 May 2013 (UTC) |+|
:I kind of agree with you, Scimmia, only problem is that "some of the themes in the package may not work right" is an overstatement: the only fully working theme in the package is "default"! :) --[[User: Bruno.unna| Bruno.unna]] ([[User talk: Bruno.unna|talk]]) 10: 22, 6 May 2013 (UTC) |+|
:I , but be . of I 'a .
[[User:Scimmia|Scimmia]] ([[User talk:Scimmia|talk]]) :, 2013 (UTC)
:I the in the
:[[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]]) 10:, 2013 (UTC)
Revision as of 10:26, 14 August 2013
Termonology Section ?
Should there be a Section how to use the module quick access in relation of the Terminology Console to set up a drop down console ?
Because aur packages like this: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/terminology-guake-git/?setlang=de
Are a sign that this method is not well known ...
- I don't know about a Terminology section, but a section on how to use the Quick Access plugin would be appropriate. Terminology isn't part of Enlightenment, so I don't think it makes sense to add a section specifically about it here.
- Scimmia (talk) 03:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I will look forward to write something about the plugin in the next week.
- Bu5hm4n (talk) 10:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)